It's all terriblr

I just rate the Dems as slightly worse

@TheBritishGamer ❤🔑 (Meh) Both too low for me to rate

I will float that, both parties went off the deep end

i dont know about you guys but i stay away from those muslim women covered in all black and muslims with backpacks or bulky jackets...you never know when they gonna explode

kaboom

i t s j u s t a c l o c k

obummer agrees

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/03/clock-boy-family-loses-racism-lawsuit-against-city-school-and-police/

@Tyberius D, I'd count their race as Subcontinent

That's what I've always heard being used

Because it's like calling a Korean a Jap

Or a Chinese a Jap

That is the major Indian culture group

Chinese, Koreans, Mongols, and Japanese all far into the Far East group

And we don't call it Chinese

The British called it the Raj

Or the Subcontinet

Oh, and the Siber

Only using India because no-one really cared about the Pakistani and Bangladeshi part of it

Valid, but details

Again, calling them all Indians is like calling all of the Far-East Chinese

It's Subcontinent

@TheBritishGamer ❤🔑 (Meh) only difference between Pakistan and India is religion. Thete are sub-divides in both countries that count as separate ethic groups but that's a mess

So we can generalise all Subcontinentals but not generalise all the Orientals

I see

A flaw

I spot a flaw

That's what I did, East Asians (Orientals) are part of the same major culture group, just like the Indian subcon...

... Problem is, most of the Indian sub groups are part of the nation of India, where China, Japan, ect are different nations

How about Tibet?

Singjiang?

(Sorry if I spelt that wrong)

Distinctions are needed, but always odd

Indians and Pakis should all be called Indians but Chinese and Koreans? Nah, that would be bad to call them all Chinese

GG @TheBritishGamer ❤🔑 (Meh), you just advanced to level 8!

Because that's what it sounds like

@TheBritishGamer ❤🔑 (Meh) Tibet is wierd... Ethnic Chinese but Indian influenced. Ughiours are actually Turks, that a long story.

So what's the difference?

Why can't Koreans and Japs be called Chinese but Bangolis and Pakis can be called Indian?

Think of it like this, India is to Europe as China/Japan is to US/Canada.

If I were to divide Indians I would divide them by their ethnic groups (Hindi, Marathi, Punjabi) as I would Europeans (Germans, French, Spanish.) Problem for most people is that Europeans have their own countries where The country of India is effectively a Federal version of the EU.