Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 412560675341205504


2018-02-07 02:12:02 UTC  

*"His doctoral thesis at the Army War College, Use of Standard Operational Planning
to Quell Domestic Civil Disturbances, won him his third star. In his thesis he applies
various military scenarios within cities to suppress civil unrest."*

2018-02-12 10:44:53 UTC  

Note that the much-promoted "war on drugs" provides an expedient vehicle for the establishment to desensitize the military to domestic operations, and to bring up the military's heavy firepower for the inevitable showdown with the urban gangs as they accelerate their ongoing transformation into political/military organizations. The establishment must at all costs retain its monopoly on political and military power to realize its ultimate goal, imperial conversion, and this will ultimately require turning the military's heavy firepower on any and all who oppose that goal and monopoly.

2018-02-12 10:45:03 UTC  

Here's another mention of civil war in America. The Nov. 12, 1995 issue of the Boston Globe magazine had an article written by John Powers, an article titled "The Splintering of America" (The Boston Globe Magazine, "Splintering of America", Nov. 12, 1995,p. 23). The article cited the usual ethnic and linguistic mess that America has become and openly asked;

2018-02-12 10:45:25 UTC  

*" Is the United States destined to come apart as the Soviet Union did, fracturing into
dozens of rival sociocultural and political enclaves?"*

2018-02-12 10:45:37 UTC  

At the end of the article, where writers usually sum up their point, a professor of ethnic studies at the University of California, Berkeley, Ronald Takaki, was quoted as saying:

2018-02-12 10:45:48 UTC  

*"We have a double vision. We look at our diversity, and we also look at Bosnia - and we worry."*

2018-02-12 10:46:02 UTC  

The overall tendency is for establishment types to predict a crime and poverty-stricken multiracial banana republic, something like Brazil. Brazil is wracked by violence, but has so far avoided massive bloodshed like Bosnia. In such a society, the establishment reckons it can endure quite nicely behind its razor wire, walls and security guards. This optimistic view is based on their utter contempt for working-class whites. I'm confident they will be proven wrong, but time will tell.

2018-02-12 10:46:12 UTC  

This is from an essay by Charles Krauthammer in the November 13, 1995 issue of Time magazine:

2018-02-12 10:46:28 UTC  

*"America is proceeding blithely down the path of diversity and ethnic separatism. America's destination, however, is not Canada, which will find some civil way out of its dilemma. America's destination is the Balkans." (Time Magazine, "Quebec and the Death of Diversity", November 13, 1995,p.124.)*

2018-02-12 10:46:37 UTC  

Here's another mention of civil war in America. In the April 10,1995 issue of Forbes magazine. Dr. Thomas Sowell, in an article on affirmative action, said this:

2018-02-12 10:46:49 UTC  

*"Nor do Americans need to go to the brink of civil war before repealing a policy that has produced polarization and intergroup violence in other countries, including even civil war in Sri Lanka." (Forbes Magazine, "The 'Q' Word", April 10,1995, p. 61)*

2018-02-12 10:47:00 UTC  

Here's another mention of a second civil war in America. In the July 19, 1995 issue of The New York Post, columnist Scott McConnell had much to say on this subject in a column entitled, "American Apocalypse - Soon?":

2018-02-12 10:47:11 UTC  

*"Civil strife is painful; civil war dreadful beyond words. In its current direction,
however, the United States - aggressively multicultural, libertine and violent in its
mass entertainment, with its rapidly expanding third-world populations and its
corporations eager to pull up stakes and transfer jobs abroad - hardly seems stable
in the long run." (The New York Post, "American Apocalypse - Soon?", Editorial Section,
July 19, 1995)*

2018-02-12 10:47:19 UTC  

Here's what Robert Kaplan had to say in the February, 1994 issue of the Atlantic Monthly in an article entitled," The Coming Anarchy":

2018-02-12 10:47:27 UTC  

*"Indeed, it is not clear that the United States will survive the next century in exactly
its present form. Because America is a multiethnic society, the nation-state has
always been more fragile here than it is in more homogeneous societies like
Germany and Japan." (The Atlantic Monthly, "The Coming Anarchy", Feb., 1994, p. 76)*

2018-02-12 10:47:35 UTC  

Readers will note that despite all the direct and indirect references to ethnic instability and even ethnic warfare in America, one almost never comes across a simple declarative sentence something like this:"It is probable that America will erupt in ethnic warfare." Simple, right?

2018-02-12 10:47:45 UTC  

Even the timid establishment press has started to admit the inevitability of a second civil war in America, as the above excerpts testify. Collectively, they covered most of the main points: a multiethnic society, a history of extreme internal and external violence, plenty of guns, a sinking economy, waning global power, drug gangs, urban decay, lower wages each year, massive illegal immigration, corrupt politicians, our deliberate transformation into a third-world country, the growing gap between rich and poor, the formation of militias, the rejection of assimilation, and racist affirmative action.

2018-02-12 10:47:55 UTC  

It is instructive to note that the most explicit, accurate, clinical and extensive of these observations were made by a foreigner, Professor van Creveld. Americans, especially establishment white Americans, cringe when anyone mentions the possibility of a race war in America. They do so partly out of the absurd notion that anyone who breaches the topic must be a racist who desires such a conflict. By the same absurd logic, weathermen must somehow generate the hurricanes they predict.

2018-02-12 10:48:06 UTC  

There is another unspoken reason why even the mention of this topic, or rather its explicit public mention, draws such negative reactions. The establishment, in order to manipulate public opinion, has succeeded in reducing discussions of race relations to a ritual, a ritual for which the high priests of the media and political elite have written the ceremonial script. Nothing outside the ceremonial script is tolerated; all else is heresy. The establishment has succeeded in manipulating the minds of most Americans to the point that racism means white racism exclusively. Black racism simply does not exist in establishment mythology, and any assertion that it does is immediately denounced by shrill accusations of racism. In fact, by the concoction of the racist euphemism affirmative action, the establishment has succeeded in painting black racism as beautiful, rather like putting a dress on a pig.

2018-02-12 10:48:35 UTC  

Despite the establishment's attempts to choke off debate, increasing and organized violence will eventually push the topic onto every television screen and newspaper editorial in America. Watch for more explicit and veiled mentions of Civil War II in the press. As Civil War II draws nearer, they will become more frequent.

2018-02-12 10:48:50 UTC  

In fact, at some point, public endorsement of the possibility of a second civil war in America will become acceptable, even fashionable. Radical blacks will endorse the concept of Civil War II as ameans of frightening the largesse out of white liberals and cementing black solidarity. Right-wing whites will also endorse it, some as a projection of what they desire, others because of the chilling signs that it's drawing ever nearer. Some politically-correct whites will embrace it as yet more proof of white racism, and establishmentwhites will use it as an excuse to increase their power (and therefore the amount of money they can steal.)

2018-02-12 10:49:13 UTC  

Ultimately, the concept of Civil War II will be as much a current topic as, say, the Greenhouse Effect, alternate lifestyles, drugs, or the latest fad diet. One can not fix a problem until one is aware of it. By this measure, the increased talk of Civil War II will be a positive development. The developing trend seems to be that liberal intellectuals think our conversion into an imperial system will be successful, and that a civil war will either not take place or be a sputtering affair easily put down. The conservative commentators seem to be lining up behind the idea that the war will be serious, and that America will probably be partitioned. These two views warrant close monitoring as they are bound to have some impact on the course of events. However, the bottom line is that events will unfold in much the same manner as they did prior to our first civil war. There was much talk of secession and civil war prior to the actual occurrence of both. However, all the talk was sufficient neither to prevent secession, nor even make realistic military preparations for the conflict. Almost all those who foresaw our first civil war imagined it as an almost bloodless summer frolic. President Lincoln asked for 90-day volunteers, and the clueless gentlefolk of Washington packed picnic baskets before heading off to take in the First Battle of Bull Run. (OK, Manassas for you unreconstructed Rebs.)

2018-02-12 10:49:22 UTC  

Nothing indicates that our second civil war will develop any differently. Even those who eventually concede Civil War II's inevitability will envision it as a summer of riots put down by the national guard, and its underlying causes permanently uprooted by some antipoverty programs and midnight basketball. No, the tribal war drums are beating too loudly for that. It will last years, kill millions, and shatter America into starving tribal enclaves.