I never said it was

They do a good job balancing the duality though. Seems like the power shifts every election cycle between what's expediently moral, and hard truths that need to be discussed in order to get desired outcomes in the long run

The courts are more powerful than any other branch

And not much gets done

I don't think they are that powerful. Not unless you listen to the recent far left media portrayals. Ben Sasse from Nebraska does a good job summing up why it seems that way

He spoke a bit during the kavanagh ford inquiry

The courts can block anything they want

Individual federal judges can block executive orders

Whoever controls scotus controls everything

And legislative laws can be vetoed

It's all as designed. Nothing has changed

Progress should be slow and arduous. The best way to keep people happy. Is no one should get 100% their way

Fastest way to corruption and the rule of money

Executive orders should be constrained though

Corruption occurs in any hierarchy. And hierarchies are inevitable no matter how the cards are dealt

Well, socialism is the purest form of democracy to an extent

because the people collectively make the decisions, unlike in businesses today where workplace democracy isn't that much widespread or influential anyway

Yeah, but the default human condition isn't to necessarily want to be educated and knowledgeable about how to effectively participate in a democracy. Some people just content being dumb. If anything that's a preferable form of existence. When I see ads telling people to go out and blindly vote, I always smh

If you need to be told and guilted to go out and vote, I don't think you've spent enough time mulling over the information needed to make a sound decision.

socialism is not the 'purest democracy'. referendums are 'pure democracy', socialism doesn't have to be involved. That said, pure democracies generally are fucking terrible just like socialism.

Letting people on the higher end of the scale make all the choices leads back to the Nobility issue WW1 had.

Just because you're smart doesn't mean you have the best interest of the people at hand.

And when you're too much of an ideologue without skills you end up creating a nightmare for the people.

From what I've seen when you've got the resources and intellect to do so, you just outsource and pack your bags for another domino which isn't falling yet.

It's not as if there aren't alliances and coalitions to keep the moved resources intact after all.

smart really does not have much impact on the "Ethics" or being a man of the people. Like Killary is smart.... and that's what enables her to get so wicked so many times with good ol' Bill. They are not dumb people, which is what makes them dangerous.

A lot of socialist leaders were very intelligent, this is how they used socialism as a tool to mass produce useful idiots which they would eventually also shoot down.

it also naturally builds ego, which is cancer in the end. Anointed, narcissistic people who "DESERVE" to be at the top. Very few successful leaders in history have dictated themselves like that. Like Genghis Khan did not give a fuck about his background and culture, the guy just wanted to expand the empire.

Sup pedes

builds ego? lol

and socialism was terrible? I disagree with that.

What manner of base primate are you? Answer below

@Leiro レイロ

When has socialism ever worked? @Leiro レイロ

Errr, accomplished the end goal where it creates a utopia?

Socialism is evil, one reason being infringement of individual rights. I believe terrible suits the ideology quite well.

Capitalism is goat. Convince me otherwise.

END BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP

It for sure needs to be looked at and possibly adjusted, due to people immigrating illegally and having kids here. Damn loopholes every time.

?jrcent

No changes were made.

<@&363416030254465024> who can I speak to about partnerships?