Because echo Chambers are lame... Don't be an echo chamber, be a good sport man.

Why not?

Unless you make it an express rule people are gonna share what they want

So like its cool if you don't want it, just make it a rule

I am just asking as there is a big difference between an echo chamber and someone that is spreading fake news. According to him I used steroids and was involved in fraudulent activity with charities. Should I just ignore that and allow him to spread his fake news?

He's not talking about you now?

Take him on about it then, get him on the your live stream or something, and clear the rumours... If you ignore it and leave it be, it doesn't exactly do much in your favour, even if you call it fake news.

So I can make wild allegations against him but as long as I have another video out that doesn't talk about him then it's all good

I will not engage with anon profiles. If people can't say these things behind a real profile then why should I give it airtime.

Then don't, but that doesn't stop others. Some people understand that anonymity protects unpopular opinions and some truths, that would otherwise get them fired, or even killed in some circumstances. I think its a shitty excuse not to engage with a real person even if they use an anon identity, but that's just my anon opinion I guess. You allow us anons on your discord, to engage with you and your followers, why the double standard then when it comes to cases like this oke?

The irony is the same people who claim to want to protect themselves from being fired and targetted are the same ones that do exactly the same thing to other people behind anon accounts

Lol that's pretty vague and general

Good thing I don't take offence since that is an utter lie with regards to me.

Did I say ALL of anon accounts?

You pretty much generalised lol

How do you realistically expect me to make a response video to someone that uses an anon profile to attack me on information he received from sources that are upset that I shut down their blog in 2010?

Why would I give anyone like that a response, secondly why should I allow the same person to promote their videos on MY discord server? It's not an echo chamber debate... it's a debate based on someone talking kak about me but will gladly use my Discord server to promote their latest video

I don't get the whole thing about having to display your real info on youtube

It's your reputation, deal with it as you please. I just don't think it will do you any good to go down that route.

Whether or not you display your real face doesn't credit or discredit an argument you present

Don't see how it will make you any different to those that forbid you and your content out of disagreement.

@Cal fully agree... I think it's a matter of leverage perhaps

Especially when you have arguably unpopular opinions, its fucking suicide to actually go all in

If we had the society and government that protected free speech and ideas, there would be less anons... Stop enabling tyranny and then complaining about the anonymity. Double standards aren't cool.

If you hide behind an anon profile and do exactly what you proclaim to defend against by having an anon profile then you show your hypocrisy.

Not necessarily. I still get to say what I want and need to, and do so under a pseudonym of my choice that represents me fairly. I see no hypocrisy here lol also I'm very much comfortable with my job, my professional life has nothing to do with my personal life really so yeah... There is no problem with this anonymity, I'm still a real person with real opinions.

Hello

Jesus shit went down...

big question, why is steroids a problem? what is wrong with steroids?

im trying to ask why be angry with him saying that, who cares?

a lie would be a lie, is bad, no matter what. So if it is a lie it would be understandable of it upsets him.

i guess yes. but if it is lies then it must be illegal?

I'm not sure about the legality in personal capacity, if however it is related to a professional capacity it would be considered cheating though. I don't know if it was within a professional capacity or not, and there is still no evidence to prove it, so it still remains a rumour. The only thing that does does come across as dodgy is the fraud related stuff, some things have been on display that could be argued as evidence, but I'm no financial investigator to claim if its sufficient or not. I suppose simply showing his side of monies received and receipts of how it was spent could easily discredit it, and just having it peer reviewed and verified would make it a closed deal. Whether its worth his time to put the rumours to sleep or let it run free is his prerogative.

I am road legal bitches

I got my license today

Congrats lol let's see how much that ups your game now lol

Not allowed to meme and drive neh

@Meerkat_RSA Holla' at my crib homeslice

@Meerkat_RSA well done broer!

Thanks.