It says it in the name

They had socialist ideals

So

USSR was a communist authoritarian government

North Korea is the people Republic of Korea

It was the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

Also authoritarian dictatorship

Yet you wouldn’t call it a democratic state

That was because they had a dictator

What the name says means nothing

It should.

Sure but it means nothing

And I don't like the idea of people working then giving it to other people to distribute it

At the core of it just saying a nation fell apart because of communism and nothing else is a bit misleading

Rehab will worsen a celebrity's behavior.

True

to which one

It could’ve worked had it controlled the entire world

But it didn’t

They had to trade with capitalist countries

Eh there would have been a mistake somewhere

Not the idea of communism but the idea of leninism and trotskyism

🆙 | **Boo leveled up!**

Theoretically

And then that mistake would grow and take the whole thing down

That goes for every nation

Communist ideals make no mention of world domination

So it isn’t really fair to use that

Not so much as a socialist nation

Because then they can control what is being distributed

No but if you would want communism to work you would need to control the world

So that you can produce anything and eve

No you don't

Everything*

It has never been an argument for communism from any side

correct

Communism doesn't exactly stop international trade

Sure but they failed because they couldn’t keep up with their capitalistic peers

But if the had world domination

It might’ve worked

what.