sorry iran

Which

Um

Iran

sorry not Iraq

You mean the deal that was supposed to bridge gaps and end hostilities?

^

^

^

X 100

You mean the deal that was supposed to give nukes to terrorists

Do you realize that

Which Iran was infested with Terrorism

The name might not be surface level

It would've limited the amount of Uranium production to a point where it was impossible for them to make nuclear weapons

Yeah katze

Well there would have been a deal to give them nukes

It wasn't a weapons trade really

No

Also Iran accepted that they will allow the inspections of all the nuclear sites

The name isn't just surface level

I mean no nation does that

It was a uranium limit

Inspecting nuclear sites?

Well I am glad that the deal didn't go through

Why?

That was something Iran would've had to go through

If anything it was limiting their weapon potential

That's a good thing

Then you should be sad it didn't go through

I don't want them to have any nuclear weapons

You literally just disagreed with yourself

GG @Missy, you just advanced to level 2!

You said you're happy it didn't go through

Yet you said it was good if they have limited weapons

You realize that it would have been a result of the deal eventually

?

<:GWjiangoNoice:402866539491229696>

So instead of ending hostilities so that the left party who are in favor of friendship with the US and Europe be able to wrestle power from the hardliners....He just gave the power back to the hardliners

I don't think you even know what this deal was

Did you just see the word nuclear and think "terrorist weapons bad" then immediately take a pro trump stance about it