unless...

I meant winning, sorry...killing it is a guess ebonics depending on how its used, that's against the rules me thinks.

hah

all in all self determination is compatible with stealing tech and other shit like that

No its not...unless you redefine "self"

when i say self determination i mean people stay with their own kind

If you mean the entire human race by "self" than yes the subgroups are stealing from each other but not the entire human race...

for a country to be able to say : ''ok we're hungarians and we're kicking out all muslims and x, y and z''

Too much interconnection and codependency to do a reset where we would not steal from each other.

it would be possible

But who will form the underclass?

well every race has enough stupid people to be workers

and in the age of automation and life extension no one needs more unskilled immigrants

while that's true, not everyone of those workers wants to be those at the bottom of the barrel

My shadiness and predisposition to violence as well as my cunning would make the the Caliph of black people, or close to it.


Power corrupts, I know myself.

I would much rather be kept in check and compete with whites and Asians etc.

we already crowned randell gary the king of gambia

So you will take me with you to space, I will pay

Randell is my nigga

He is smart.

miss him on gab.ai, but I quite that earlier this week.

Randell, (I don't think) would want to be King of Gambia.

a few hundred years ago he would be the OG slave owner?

Randell hates Islam more than me, The Gambia is an Islamic state. And rather poor.

selling muslim slaves all over the world

Randell can run Africa

so since this is your AMA, are you a race realist?

Um, you know.

I always thought of race interms of say Dungeons and Dragons,.

Each race/human sub-race has its advantages and disadvantages.

If you mean the IQ stuff, for now I agree with and respect statistics, but I note irregularities such as (1) correlation to economic success seems low and (2) the spikiness of the Black bell curves I see mean either (A) too small of a sample size or (B) environmental factors interfering with the results.

Large data sets that have no interference tend to produce smooth bell curves, not jagged ones (depends on the scale you are looking at).

Clearly there are predispositions to things like alcoholism, tanning and other things that are strongly correlated to race.

I think one thing that is not properly addressed.

Is that while we can properly identify that a significant number of Blacks are not effectively controlling their negative pre-dispositions, no one is asking why. Just saying its in the genes.

If "lack of control" was also in the genes, the prevalence of black crime and violence should be WAY higher.

As high as say, giving an Asian strong alcohol and watching their cheeks redden.

Do I make sense? I am rambling a bit...listening to Sargon of Akkad talk about PewDiePie...sorry.

While thinking of my code....it's Friday...

ill take that as a yes

Well just because youre saying someone is genetically predisposed to something does not mean they cant repress said urges or adapt to their environment

It's a yes, and the results sadden me as someone who loves my race. But numbers don't like, people do.

yikes

I meant @Father Chad

it's ridiculous to think that a group went through microevolutions to create a culture and that suddenly they cant change ever again