diversity, i didnt do a DNA test. i did historical research into my family tree going back in the 1600s

i found the actual documentation of my ancestors

ah, OK

how interesting

i did historical research on my family. turns out my dad is from England and my mom is a Czech from Germany. looks like i'm white

DNA tests are better

@Jossi sounds white to me

i is

WHITE POWER 1488

out of 500-1000 direct ancestors i have from the early 1700s i only found a fraction of them documented and 1 black man

i'm tired of typing the slash

@bb22 back of the bus! jk

my point is that when you have 500-1000 direct ancestors from 300 years ago the odds of them all being 100% white are slim to none, thus "one drop rule" being ignorant

see the links in that gab post

facts disagree

i wouldn't take it too seriously though

that makes you 0.0025% african or something like that

i wonder if people are angry that i, as a white man, have default access to white women

yes

"where da white women at?"

okay im going to open that link you sent and we're going to talk about it in detail

wooooord up niggaz

have fun

it's fascinating stuff

youll have fun with me lol

we have fun with everything

we're going to talk about it because i know how these tests work

half-troll, half-activist

there is a big flashing light that says NEGRO DETECTED and then you never get into a hip club again

that's how the tests work?

the website you sent has to do with associating certain genes locations based on where they occur most commonly

how does that relate to fact that "one drop rule" is a bunch of bullshit?

"Understanding the genetic structure of human populations is of fundamental interest to medical, forensic and anthropological sciences. Advances in high-throughput genotyping technology have markedly improved our understanding of global patterns of human genetic variation and suggest the potential to use large samples to uncover variation among closely spaced populations"

if you read the abstract of the scientific study theyre citing, the purpose of the study was explicitly to gather data from particular geographic locations in europe and map the relative genetic similarity of the people living in those areas as opposed to people further away from those areas

the one drop rule is not bullshit, within a certain number of generations

yes, exactly: most people breed with those like them

thus the random breeding thesis is bullshit 😃

so the whole purpose of this particular study was basically to measure minute markers of how inbred people are in given geographical locations in europe today

"most people breed with those like them" -- im not disputing that

https://twitter.com/RealGoatGaming

if you think im disputing that then youre going to be talking past me for a long time