Message from @bb22
Discord ID: 259052285538074624
my argument about race is that we're all mixed to some level, even if its only 1%
If you are upstream EXCLUSIVELY from something, you can toast it
i think all the "one drop rule" people are ignorant
@bb22 of course, given your test results, but consider a middle path
can toast anything that is online like i said.
miscegenation is death, and trace admixture is a problem
test results?
the only way to do a dark web would be an encrypted end-to-end app
invisible entirely
and highly vetted
these exist, but are not for casual use
lol probably be slow too
like freenet
@bb22 i think you had mentioned a drop of something in your ancestry results
i dont think you can access open internet easily with freenet but ive never used it
with tor you literally have to target their servers and at that point youd be messing with people who arent internet noobs like i said
@MrGoat it would be slow if decentralized
true
diversity, i didnt do a DNA test. i did historical research into my family tree going back in the 1600s
ah, OK
how interesting
i did historical research on my family. turns out my dad is from England and my mom is a Czech from Germany. looks like i'm white
DNA tests are better
@Jossi sounds white to me
i is
WHITE POWER 1488
out of 500-1000 direct ancestors i have from the early 1700s i only found a fraction of them documented and 1 black man
i'm tired of typing the slash
@bb22 back of the bus! jk
my point is that when you have 500-1000 direct ancestors from 300 years ago the odds of them all being 100% white are slim to none, thus "one drop rule" being ignorant
see the links in that gab post
facts disagree
i wouldn't take it too seriously though
that makes you 0.0025% african or something like that
i wonder if people are angry that i, as a white man, have default access to white women
yes
"where da white women at?"
okay im going to open that link you sent and we're going to talk about it in detail
wooooord up niggaz