Message from @bb22

Discord ID: 259055202575843329


2016-12-15 20:23:49 UTC  

it's fascinating stuff

2016-12-15 20:23:53 UTC  

youll have fun with me lol

2016-12-15 20:23:59 UTC  

we have fun with everything

2016-12-15 20:24:01 UTC  

we're going to talk about it because i know how these tests work

2016-12-15 20:24:12 UTC  

half-troll, half-activist

2016-12-15 20:24:37 UTC  

there is a big flashing light that says NEGRO DETECTED and then you never get into a hip club again

2016-12-15 20:24:43 UTC  

that's how the tests work?

2016-12-15 20:25:54 UTC  

the website you sent has to do with associating certain genes locations based on where they occur most commonly

2016-12-15 20:26:15 UTC  

how does that relate to fact that "one drop rule" is a bunch of bullshit?

2016-12-15 20:30:38 UTC  

"Understanding the genetic structure of human populations is of fundamental interest to medical, forensic and anthropological sciences. Advances in high-throughput genotyping technology have markedly improved our understanding of global patterns of human genetic variation and suggest the potential to use large samples to uncover variation among closely spaced populations"

2016-12-15 20:31:13 UTC  

if you read the abstract of the scientific study theyre citing, the purpose of the study was explicitly to gather data from particular geographic locations in europe and map the relative genetic similarity of the people living in those areas as opposed to people further away from those areas

2016-12-15 20:31:22 UTC  

the one drop rule is not bullshit, within a certain number of generations

2016-12-15 20:31:30 UTC  

yes, exactly: most people breed with those like them

2016-12-15 20:31:38 UTC  

thus the random breeding thesis is bullshit 😃

2016-12-15 20:31:40 UTC  

so the whole purpose of this particular study was basically to measure minute markers of how inbred people are in given geographical locations in europe today

2016-12-15 20:31:58 UTC  

"most people breed with those like them" -- im not disputing that

2016-12-15 20:32:24 UTC  

if you think im disputing that then youre going to be talking past me for a long time

2016-12-15 20:32:49 UTC  

this is why only 5% of whites have admixture

2016-12-15 20:32:51 UTC  

this is the actual article in nature that theyre citing

2016-12-15 20:33:08 UTC  

i'm bavarian, i have leiderhosen and i eat schnitzle.

2016-12-15 20:33:37 UTC  

you scandinavian, diversity?

2016-12-15 20:33:47 UTC  

german, czech and english

2016-12-15 20:33:54 UTC  

i mean diversity

2016-12-15 20:34:06 UTC  

for the record im mostly scottish by direct lineage, also german and english

2016-12-15 20:34:08 UTC  

i'm diverse, my mom and dad are different shades of white

2016-12-15 20:34:13 UTC  

only found one french ancestor

2016-12-15 20:35:03 UTC  

unless somebody is straight up transparent with blond or white hair and blue eyes i have bad news for them

2016-12-15 20:35:15 UTC  

im blonde with green eyes

2016-12-15 20:35:21 UTC  

argument to extremes does not work that way

2016-12-15 20:35:30 UTC  

the data shows that most people are ethnically consistent

2016-12-15 20:35:35 UTC  

therefore, "everyone is part black" is nonsense

2016-12-15 20:35:38 UTC  

as the facts show

2016-12-15 20:35:39 UTC  

you think scandinavians randomly mutate into dark haired people with brown eyes?

2016-12-15 20:35:54 UTC  

no, probably admixture of bruins

2016-12-15 20:35:59 UTC  

who were always there

2016-12-15 20:36:04 UTC  

"always there"

2016-12-15 20:36:10 UTC  

i guess god made them that way

2016-12-15 20:36:15 UTC  

more reading