Message from @TGnome

Discord ID: 259066201752207361


2016-12-15 21:14:07 UTC  

I cannot fathom why intelligent people oppose it, honestly

2016-12-15 21:14:07 UTC  

idiocracy will not accept eugenics 😃

2016-12-15 21:14:14 UTC  

they are afraid of government

2016-12-15 21:14:20 UTC  

the natural way is to let nature do it

2016-12-15 21:14:27 UTC  

get warning labels off everything, end all benefits

2016-12-15 21:14:37 UTC  

let people die out for stupidity, ineptitude, etc

2016-12-15 21:14:42 UTC  

affirmative action is anti-eugenics

2016-12-15 21:15:04 UTC  

Look, IQ is the least problematic part

2016-12-15 21:15:26 UTC  

we are speaking about more important issues, and that is weeding out genetically transfered conditions, diseases and deformations

2016-12-15 21:15:34 UTC  

those are important too

2016-12-15 21:15:37 UTC  

Sterillizing those with family history of nasty disabilities and genes

2016-12-15 21:15:42 UTC  

for me, the real question is: are these people contributors?

2016-12-15 21:15:45 UTC  

Sterilizing retarded

2016-12-15 21:15:46 UTC  

or just general ill health

2016-12-15 21:16:06 UTC  

we can make an army out of the retarded

2016-12-15 21:16:07 UTC  

for fucks sake lets go back to 2 genders

2016-12-15 21:16:15 UTC  

sent it off to fight hopeless wars

2016-12-15 21:16:21 UTC  

yes, two sexes would be good

2016-12-15 21:16:23 UTC  

no leftism

2016-12-15 21:16:28 UTC  

no foxkin either

2016-12-15 21:16:35 UTC  

I propose any faggots who use the term problematic are banned on grounds of being traitorous cunts in the making.

2016-12-15 21:16:40 UTC  

You have an army of people today who will trhow themselves over each other to deliver a baby that is known to be deformed and which will live it's life as a mentally disable cripple

2016-12-15 21:16:43 UTC  

or "wow just wow"

2016-12-15 21:16:49 UTC  

LOL

2016-12-15 21:17:01 UTC  

anyone who is triggered should be triggered... i mean shot

2016-12-15 21:17:04 UTC  

Topic poll for the next hangout: https://answergarden.ch/405206

2016-12-15 21:17:18 UTC  

Auru, don't be mean, we are all guilty of words that are more present in our native language

2016-12-15 21:17:32 UTC  

I'm not being mean, I'm giving you fair warning

2016-12-15 21:17:43 UTC  

Language tells you more about someone's politics than what they say does

2016-12-15 21:18:19 UTC  

And people who use the term problematic are not people you want in your group if you have any hope of keeping it functional

2016-12-15 21:18:34 UTC  

"problematic" in english means politicized stuff now

2016-12-15 21:18:34 UTC  

You reminded me why i dont spend times in groups much

2016-12-15 21:18:42 UTC  

it is different elsewhere

2016-12-15 21:18:49 UTC  

20 years ago, "problematic" meant real problems

2016-12-15 21:18:56 UTC  

the word changed and now people get nervous when you use it

2016-12-15 21:18:56 UTC  

never heard of it

2016-12-15 21:19:07 UTC  

spoken english is widely varied within US/UK

2016-12-15 21:19:13 UTC  

doesn't make it into media so much

2016-12-15 21:19:16 UTC  

so very hard to tell

2016-12-15 21:19:25 UTC  

english is all connotation anyway, less denotation

2016-12-15 21:19:32 UTC  

the proof of this is in how phrases have such currency