rule 34: if it exists, there is porn of it

i think rule 63? or something is "if there is not porn of it, make it" or something like that

63 is genderswap

no wait, 63 is genderbender, yeah

guess its rule 35? If no porn is found of it, it will be made.

http://rulesoftheinternet.com/

someone wants to make r34 of tim and the community's tim lore

it is

they are not real rules

They're more like guidelines

Like a little pamphlet with things to do in Japan and what customs are best to be kept in mind

How can you be new to the rules of the Internet?

it's been almost 15 years since they were made 😏

not necessarily, I would say

More of a film and cartoon kind of guy

Rules of the Internet were created on 4chan. If you follow anything about free speech online, you should have bumped into them, eventually

if you spend any length of time online, you should have run into them

there's a lot that goes into internet culture, and there's a lot of subcultures on each site. Also things on the Internet evolve rapidly. If you are above 40 I would say it is natural that you aren't keeping up

Got a loose sketch so far

I'm fixing the face of stoned tim pool

I can see it looks like down syndrome

Imagine making a discord for political discussion and it eventually devolving into people drawing pictures of you fucking yourself

Oh god what did I walk into

I can do superficially politically related things if that's less upsetting

Either embrace it or well, ignore it.

At least we can claim that we got some diversity here lol.

What is so important about diversity?

Nothing, but people complain about the lack of it

Diversity of opinion and ideas seems fairly positive

So its good to havr a cover story

Diversity in ideas seems to come naturally

Boom, they are now waycist

But diversity in appearance seems a bit pointless

Yeah.

Diversity in the case of importing refugees puts an imbalance on natural diversity

Which is why shit hit the fan

"We want diversity in genetics!"
"so you just want people who are not the product of incest, then"

It's superficial diversity. Easier to accomplish, and doesn't necessarily stimulate critical analysis

It fits in perfectly with the postmodern train of thought

"diversity" is just moral pandering for politicians to get their ways