https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23067570

err

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2012.00868.x/full

this doesn't really prove that an entire race would have a significant predisposition over another

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369574/

https://www.tremr.com/Duck-Rabbit/african-americans-possess-violence-gene-researchers-find

these studies are attempting to isolate the gene from all other variables

Like in a discussion I got into someone with over islamic terrorism, the guy I was talking with pulled out the whole "it actually only accounts for 2% of world terror" argument, citing an article that used the EuroPol terror report... from 2014...

So, I skimmed it, and found some laughable results: apparently, the majority of 'terrorism' was from separatist groups; however, the report was counting stuff such as *vandalism* and *destruction of property* as terrorism.

Then I looked up what the 2016 EuroPol and looked it over, and -surprise surprise- that report confirmed that there was a *very* sharp increase in islamic terrorism.

if you are trying to prove a disposition for an entire race then you want a complete map of all genes that affect violent tenancies

sounds similar to those articles claiming that most terrorism were commited by "right-wing extremist groups"

which you are not going to be able to do

I'm not sure where I was going with this...
...anyway, sources matter. lol

this is just like the gay gene argument

Blacks are more likely to have this gene and they comit more crime so even if it's not the only reason it's still a reason.

you should be starting at the psycology, not the genes

So do you want to change black psycology then go for it and good luck.

I thought we all had the same genes, and that the differences between races was based off of which ones were 'on' or 'off'?

whites on average have more money, which causes crime therefore whites have a higher chance of commiting crime

@ping there's no need to say that race is the only factor. The thing is, don't deny it is a factor

@.B i diddn't

we can shock them into compliance

@JadenFrostwolf the different races evolved in different envrionments so they are going to be different.

all blacks must wear electronic collars

>whites on average have more money, which causes crime therefore whites have a higher chance of commiting crime
Statistically, ppl with less money commit more crime

so..

yes but they have money which causes crime

Biological science is a bit above my head, so I can't really say one way or another. I'm only going based off of what I've heard and whatever I learned in highschool.
...which isn't very much...

unlike ants, the environment all humans have been in incentivises us to adapt to our surroundings conciously instead of genetically

If it is poverty then why do poor whites comit less crime then rich blacks?

I need sources for that claim that having money increases the chance of committing crime

@Deleted User that isn't proof that poor whites commit less crime than rich blacks

median income doesn't mean shit, the disparity matters

a single poor person on that rich person's block could drop the income average 5% but they could be committing 90% of the crime

Median income is the average so it is relivent to your argument. You claim that it's income not biology.

blind people are the ones that refuse to see. I'm out

The fact is blacks comit more crime then whites becasue they have genes which make them act that way.

not really

culture is a thing

you haven't eliminated poverty, culture, income dispairty, transportation, job opportunities though

black crime is happens mostly because we destroyed their families with welfare