>to me

that is not an argument, but a preference

i rather maintain concrete, historicaly fortuitious language which i can argue my points with

which is fine to have, but does not mean it will apply to anyone else

if gender becomes volatile and not useful, people will just use "sex"

and this is how we get to "biological sex is a social construct"

if gender becomes volatile and not useful it will be because people are using it for that purpose

meaning its not useless

if enough SJW use racism as "prejudice+power" should we assume the definition changed too?

they will change it against your will if you let them

@.B good news, they now have a name for prejudice against people of the same power level, its apparently called colorism

ik

xD

and colorism is exactly what the initial racism was

which is ironic

which is why i think its best just to just give gender a better definition or no definition at all

and invalidates their redifinition of racism

gotta love when they finally realized there are black people who are racist against black people, and had to make a new word because they were like "oh yeah... this is a thing"

or, you say gender = sex

and it's done

so does that mean black on black crime is now colorism?

wont hold up in the long run

it holded up until today

gender doesent mean sex, because boats have a gender but not a sex

what

boats?

boats are female

wut?

that is personification

most things in the spanish language have genders

so?

ahh

not all languages have gendered nouns

@Arch-Fiend but if gender =/= sex, then a boat does not have a gender, it has a sex

gender doesent equel sex

the boat has no sexual characteristics, sorry

because there is only male gender, female gender, and neutral gendered words in languages

you can't have it both ways

thats because gender doesent discribe sexual characteristics

so gender could only be binary if that is the point you tried to make

well no physical ones

gender only defines social and psychological sexual characteristics