Message from @Arch-Fiend

Discord ID: 420047089943314453


2018-03-05 02:33:28 UTC  

or insemination

2018-03-05 02:33:35 UTC  

you misrepresent his statements

2018-03-05 02:33:55 UTC  

gender has, in colloquial English, be the same as biological sex.

2018-03-05 02:34:11 UTC  

then i can easly say it doesent exist

2018-03-05 02:34:15 UTC  

that does not mean biological sex is called gender in science

2018-03-05 02:34:19 UTC  

and just use a different language

2018-03-05 02:34:20 UTC  

aren't you contributing to my point? if you say "sex" you assume the act, if you say "gender" you assume the binary definition which can _also_ be defined as "sex"

2018-03-05 02:34:22 UTC  

well, no words exists

2018-03-05 02:34:48 UTC  

all words are socially constructed

2018-03-05 02:34:56 UTC  

yes.. so?

2018-03-05 02:35:10 UTC  

"socially constructed" says nothing

2018-03-05 02:35:18 UTC  

so, then saying it doesn't exist because its not science, but language, is not really a good argument

2018-03-05 02:35:20 UTC  

everything is socially constructed

2018-03-05 02:35:51 UTC  

its not useful to me to have gender and sex mean the same thing because you will have people argue that gender means whatever they want it to mean while sex will never be touched, sex will simply be replaced and ultimately youll lose the argument in the long run

2018-03-05 02:36:12 UTC  

the other way around

2018-03-05 02:36:15 UTC  

>to me

that is not an argument, but a preference

2018-03-05 02:36:16 UTC  

i rather maintain concrete, historicaly fortuitious language which i can argue my points with

2018-03-05 02:36:33 UTC  

which is fine to have, but does not mean it will apply to anyone else

2018-03-05 02:36:35 UTC  

if gender becomes volatile and not useful, people will just use "sex"

2018-03-05 02:37:04 UTC  

and this is how we get to "biological sex is a social construct"

2018-03-05 02:37:10 UTC  

if gender becomes volatile and not useful it will be because people are using it for that purpose

2018-03-05 02:37:22 UTC  

meaning its not useless

2018-03-05 02:37:48 UTC  

if enough SJW use racism as "prejudice+power" should we assume the definition changed too?

2018-03-05 02:38:13 UTC  

they will change it against your will if you let them

2018-03-05 02:38:22 UTC  

@.B good news, they now have a name for prejudice against people of the same power level, its apparently called colorism

2018-03-05 02:38:28 UTC  

ik

2018-03-05 02:38:30 UTC  

xD

2018-03-05 02:38:47 UTC  

and colorism is exactly what the initial racism was

2018-03-05 02:38:50 UTC  

which is ironic

2018-03-05 02:38:56 UTC  

which is why i think its best just to just give gender a better definition or no definition at all

2018-03-05 02:39:01 UTC  

and invalidates their redifinition of racism

2018-03-05 02:39:12 UTC  

gotta love when they finally realized there are black people who are racist against black people, and had to make a new word because they were like "oh yeah... this is a thing"

2018-03-05 02:39:17 UTC  

or, you say gender = sex

2018-03-05 02:39:21 UTC  

and it's done

2018-03-05 02:39:30 UTC  

so does that mean black on black crime is now colorism?

2018-03-05 02:39:32 UTC  

wont hold up in the long run

2018-03-05 02:39:54 UTC  

it holded up until today

2018-03-05 02:39:54 UTC  

gender doesent mean sex, because boats have a gender but not a sex

2018-03-05 02:40:04 UTC  

what

2018-03-05 02:40:06 UTC  

boats?

2018-03-05 02:40:10 UTC  

boats are female