Or you can have the YT that we have. A very rich company that realizes how important a site like YT is and writes off the cost as a charity.

They don't write it off as charity. It's overhead fr advertising.

For*

A company could.

YouTube isn't important. We had tv and still do.

It's only popular because it is free, and people can make a living off it

But it's free because we are not the customer. Companies are

Which is why it keeps shooting it's creators because it's customers are being finicky

You have to pay to use the air waves. YT is important because it is free for everyone. TV has gate keepers. Thats why I think it would be good for a company to realize the good that YT brings and take it on as a charity. No need to worry about hit pieces. Although I'm not sure how long theses pieces will have any effect.

youtube has gatekeepers

Where are the gay traps?

It's Thursday. They take Thursdays off. Come back tomorrow.

YT has Gatekeepers. I didn't say it was perfect put a private company is the best way to run it. You can't have it ran by a government.

the only real way to not have gatekeepers is either through having lots of competition, or by decentralization. Which should be an option with block chain. make creators pay for storage of their videos. "want 50 gb for data? give me 50 gb on your machine. uninstall the app? fine, your channel goes down by how much space that machine gave me"

put all the cost on the people using the system

then there is no gate keepers.

actually, i wonder....

That is the other way to do it. But even a system like that runs into the gate keeper issue. There is maintainance of the coding and I'm all for free expression but I don't want to be chipping into a site that allows child porn on it.

maintenance of open source stuff is usually done by the people who use it.

YT is the second biggest search engine in the western world. I think it's to big to be run by bedroom coders.

first off: its google, not really youtube.
second: you underestimate the power of open source

O might be underestimating it. Google is #1 YT is #2

I*

they are the same company

probably by now very similar algorithms

thats why i say google

or really Alphabet

Thats like saying Amazon and Twitch are the same company. Yes they are working close but when ppl 'google' something you aren't looking it up on YT. They are separate entities with separate teams.

well, more like if i search youtube i don't find it on google. but i will find youtube on google

so i count them as one in the same in the sense that i wouldn't be surprised if googles algorithm is built into youtubes, with just a limit to youtube only results.

That's fair enough but that's not how most ppl use or view the two sites.

https://puu.sh/AsbG1/1a8d4df82c.png

He said it!

The absolute madman!

Primarch Elon Musk of the Tesla Marines?

God Emperor Trumps lost son?

pharmacy: "yeah, it will take me like 2 minutes to fill this bottle.... but i'm gonna take 6 hours and charge 1000 bucks per hour"

but hey, its the tax break giving this to the 1% that ruins america

the 1% that ruins america? you mean politicians?