Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 458412178878365708
It will be Star Wars done right.
Game over man, game over
it'll be the colonial marines from Aliens
hey, if we want to get back to the moon, or really ensure our species survival by getting off this rock, i say the best way is to tell the government there is an enemy on the moon, or on mars. Or that the ruskies are gonna build a base there, and we will be there in no time flat.
😂
isint nasa a military org?
Hmm, so he can be the god emperor of the imperium?
Space race suppremacy
And now to wait for Russia to do the same since the gentlemans agreement not to weaponize space is officially gone. Rather than unofficially never adhered to.
Wasn’t it just that you can’t have nukes in space?
Nuclear weapons and other WMD cannot be placed into orbit, and celestial bodies cannot be used as testing grounds, military bases, and cannot have weapons of any kind. Conventional weapons in orbit are A-OK.
So ABM interceptor missiles & lasers wouldn't violate the treaty, and rods-from-god would probably also be OK presuming they are built with yields in line with conventional munitions.
pretty sure missiles wouldn't work nearly as well in space for intercepting anything.
outside of stuff already in a known orbit
I made this a WHILE ago.
BTW I'm True Neutral.
I guess Hitler was lawful good
Actually, Hitler would've been Lawful Neutral, I'm ashamed to say.
The person I most associate with "lawful neutral" is Sessions. I've never seen someone so literally try to obey the letter of the law.
Well, I mean
That chart is meant entirely as a joke, anyway.
true, just a statement I wanted to say that no one would actually listen to
but the actual political compass test does NOT actually measure policy
only inclination
in much the same way that how much you bench press does not measure how well you'll do in a fight.
There are other factors
and part of the point of horseshoe theory is really that authoritarians who don't share the same political outlook hate each other, and people who are on the libertarian (chaotic) side of things are far more likely to be able to coexist in peace, at the very least.
So, in dealing with people online, I think I'm going to start reposting people's arguments with appeals to emotion removed before I continue to dismantle their argument. I just had one particular argument (where I didn't think to do this first). Anyone care to judge? I'm trying to leave in things that are relevant to the conversation, anything you'd remove or add, I'm fine tuning here.
