You can have tests, whatever, a secret cabal, but even then those things can be infiltrated and corrupted.

Democracy can work in smaller countries, like finland.

And even AI is not infallible

Democracy, I'd argue, does require more heterogeneity.

pardon my spelling

I disagree with the accomodating to change thing but yes there should be some freedoms given to academics, scientists and those sorts of people so we can still have good ideas and advance.

Unless we have a test that is 100% capable of choosing our God Emperor of the Imperium, keeping him immortal, and ensuring he does not stray from his task

Then maybe

For the emp'ruh

Will a fascist govt allow changes that require them to cede some power

You need a test to ensure that the person will do that as well

Thats not even fascism at that point, thats a rational democray

Complete freedoms for scientists would result in BioShock

Fuck me, too much stellaris

A fascist-dictatorship can easily turn communist dictatorship in the right hands with one assassination.

I know there are some bad leaders that come around in doctorships but I think having a bad leader for a few years is better then having society be shitty forever.

Communism is literally the worst thing ever

It's the only system with no freedom and all poverty

Authoritarianism in general

Well dont get me wrong, if a fascist system would work, it wont now and not for a long time

We dont have the safeguards, the societal behaviour, or the proper tests and procedures to ensure it happens.

It can, but you are asking of things that are impossible of humans because of humans

There was an African dictator who made his country the richest one in the continent within two years, and gave his citizens free education

Humans are simply too volatile for a system that rigid. And to make it rigid, you make it hell

Well I'm just a fascist. Keep in mind that fascism is just a autocratic goverment which is nationalistic which means civic nationalists can run the goverment.

Uh

I....don't think that's very accurate

I am not disagreeing. I simply say that a fascist system is impossible under current circumstances because of humans

An authoritharian govt can only be sure of itself for one generation.

That's why we need to wait for things to get worse then the people will chose us or (((them))).

That's awfully presumptuous.

Or you realise that the people will go fuck both of you?

>At some point people will choose between one utopian pipedream or another utopian pipedream

That will be their only chose. Yo see most people don't want to live in anarchy so they will chose to have someone tell them what to do rather then just have no order.

Well its like voting libertarian

They find a leader to prop up that isnt either

Wait, you think I'm promoting anarchy?

Just for the record I don't believe in goverment I just see national socialism as the best goverment.

>Just for the record I don't believe in government, but if we have government, it should be the biggest, baddest, most overbearing government possible!

I mean

I don't think your promoting anarchy I just see that it will happen if we or (((they))) don't take control.