like in california.... police are allowed to open carry ..... us plebians are not ... see how that class system is structured?

I think that point also proves the corruptability of any system you might put forward.

Take, for instance, the deletion of subpoenaed information in the Hillary campaign.

also.... police can legally threaten you with violence and actually initiation violence against your for "victimless crimes" but of course you cannot even defend yourself from being beaten in the face w/o being charge with "assault on police"

you cannot even TOUCH a police officer w/o being in danger of being charged w/ assault on a police officer

but they can man-handle you all they want.... that is still assault, you see. but they are a protected class

Is seriousposting in the shitpost channel considered next level shitposting?

I mean, if you're under arrest, and you attempt to bloody a cop's nose to get free...

that is not "equality" .... at all!

So if you've violated the NAP, and a security firm comes for you

How is that any different?

depends if youre under arrent for legitimate reasons.... you can be falsely arrested too

its not.... they would be in the right to detain you

Do you think that laws should only be considered violated once there's a victim, not enforced to prevent victims?

bcuz they would be responding to a violation of the NAP in the first place, so they cannot simultaneously commit it in defense

[moved to <#463068752725016579> thread]

listen to this interview

no victim, no crime 😉

So you buy cocaine and snort it up

get arrested.

No victim, no crime.

but if you agree to arbitrary rules and regulations voluntarily, and then you violate the terms of that agreement, and part of the terms is that ppl w/ guns can come after you.... thats all consistent too

But the cocaine that you bought was from a cartel that trafficks people, murders people, etc... and thus, by buying it you're a material supporter of this organization

who is the victim besides someone getting thrown into a cage for not necessarily doing anyone else harm?

and if it was from a legalized drug store?

I'm not talking about a hypothetical.

sure you are LOL

I'm talking about real world 'victimless crimes'.

Just because you don't come face to face with victims of your actions doesn't mean you're off scot free.

it is what is say... you hav eto point to a physical person who was damaged or harmed somehow

the cartels dont depend on you buying a little bit of drugs from them.... they will continue to operate regardless

No, they depend on a lot of people buying drugs from them.

not to mention how the war on drugs essentially created the incentive environment for the rise of the cartels in the first place

yeah, so you cannot take responsibility for their actions if you buy weed from someone who knows someone who knows someone who is in a drug cartel

you never intentially harmed anyone by your choices or actions

Manufacturer - > Importer/Exporter -> Distributor -> Retailer

Enforcers along the way to ensure the safe operations

The goods travel down the line

the money travels up.

This is capitalism.

listen to that vid, plz. its a good vid.... im just goign to defer you to this resource for the time being