he does have some far left videos..

it never gets too obvious, but on some videos he certainly loses it

Hes begging not to get sent in to "gulags of tolerance and reeducation "

it's like a guy said, "It's like the slowest red pilling I ever seen"

his more clickbait-ey videos are often made to appeal to either side just in title alone

Have you guys considered a red pill enema? Maby faster

I'm pretty sure he's got one video titled "THIS is why Right will WIN the culture war" and one titled "THIS is why the Left will WIN the culture war" just a few weeks apart

sometime this summer

I don't care about that tbh

but he says he tries to be neutral, but eats a lot of fake news and believes them without sources

like, explaining both sides when it is plain obvious that one of them is BS

you aren't neutral if you don't call the BS on either side

Tim signalling as left is important, it shows how looney the Open Society Foundation lefties are when they flag him as AIN or w/e

that's fair, I'm complaining about using his race as an argument though

him saying he is left doesn't bother me

can you give an example?

sec

He mentions he's half-Korean sometimes

And that his family had to move around to deal with anti-miscegenation laws

yeah I know he mentions it fairly often, in an attempt to signal to the left or tell an anecdote, but I can't recall him having used it as an argument.

http://puu.sh/BE6zF.png

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhnrKQ36rv4

the argument goes like... "I'm not white" so "I didn't enjoy white priviledge"

there is no valid reason he should be saying he is mixed there

unless he is validating the far left's way of thinking

"I didn't get my turn"
it's implied "those that are white did"

I heard a good ponit recently regarding equality, it went something like "I've been all over the world and the only time I've ever seen equality is when I saw a white man and a black man panhandling next to each other. Only the poor can have equality. Two members of the middle class will never be equal."

"I didn't get my turn" implies he didnt get any "turn" as he wasint born in to any supper power bs privilige the left likes to immagine

but by saying that, he implies ppl that are white did

yeah, definitely a bad move on Tim's end

in another videos he basically explains why racial/identity politics doesn't work (particularly for mixed race)

when he disagrees with the left, he's just another huwite male, and when he does, he's asian

I don't think he's bringing it up for personal validation, rather, to try and bridge a ideological divide

and I don't think he even brings it up as often as you make it out to be

this is just the most recent one, there's so many examples like this

he is even explicitly saying "yeah you can argue patriarchy and that", as if that actually WAS an argument with merit

no "I didn't get my turn" is talking about hes huwhite part of genetic heritage

I think it's like the argument "I'm still waiting for my check from George Soros", if they can use that logic I can use the logic that I'm still waiting on my check for having pale skin.

that doesn't work for the left, if you aren't white, you are male, there, you are priviledged

don't stoop to their level

what's next? "I don't identify as male" to fish for points too?

you understand what I mean here, right? He is trying to argue using their logic

nothing works for the left except for the bs rules the coocked up for the day

exactly