Message from @Charlemagne
Discord ID: 680535205874106380
Dispossession is the word I would use
When you evoke the word genocide, everyone has a mental image of what that looks like. That image doesn't match isn't happening in the West so it's easy to dismiss the speaker.
Replacement evokes imagery as well that actually kind of works. It passes the emotional and ethical argument check quite well.
'Replacement' gets a little harder to argue around the logical argumentation because on the micro level, nobody is being literally replaced. Everyone is still here, minus those murdered by our new neighbors. Of course on the macro level, a population is being replaced. But then again, white people don't exist, race is a social construct, and it all doesn't matter anyway bigot.
@Zemo 'Dispossession' and 'Reciprocation' are much easier to work with. I don't know if either of them pack quite the emotional punch that genocide or replacement have. So you're playing for less stakes basing an appeal on either of those.
I went a little insane making this
Is it just me or do these longer videos do better than the shorter ones?
I guess the algorithm likes it
I give some personal advice on how i defeated my Nihilism. So if any of yall are struggling out there this video is for you 🙂
Shed flesh and embrace undeath
New video premiering, my dudes @everyone
sweet
identity politics bad
individual identity good
(also im a nationalist)
~liberalists
but have you read loki
-soygon
i love how he worships locke, yet, afaik, most of his arguments rely upon god and religion
sorry
loki i mean
but you can just secularise it maaaaan
god not needed lol
yes, Locke uses the Bible a lot to defend his case, from memory he does this more in the first treatise on government then the second
Locke is a retard
Lowkey loki
his actual philosophical work was more interesting then his political work
@Starfield ^^^
Oh hello there
a writing server