Message from @GingaBomber
Discord ID: 465586003629965312
Though, thinking about it, Duke Energy was already in that position
sharing a vide in another channal reminded me of this vid which i think is applicable to the automation debate weve had a few times here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY8_F8I1Y_U
traps are gay prove me wrong
Thats not a trap. Its a flipping ambust
3rd wave feminism was good for social progress
discuss! 😛
list of subjective terms in that statement:
-3rd wave feminism
-good
-social progress
thats why its a debate my man 😛
The answer is already generally accepted here though
Like 1st wave, okay, 2nd wave, well guess so. 3rd wave, wtf is this.
^
1st and 2nd wave had a lot of questionable elements to them as well, we only remember the good ones
Like the suffragettes(NOT the suffragists) were terrorists at times. Firebombing buildings, throwing axes at politicians, defacing art, etc.
That is true.
Well, and that they could vote, if they served like men. Just that women were not required to be part of the draft.
Could they actually? I thought it was that most women didn't want the right to vote because it would've come with the draft
Which of course fuck them. They were denying others their rights because they didn't want them
Like I said, if the women signed up for the draft, which alot of them didnt, they would be able to vote as well.
It was a right they were willing to sacrifice for another.
Which is strange.
Like men still ahve to sign up, women dont have to,
Do you know any source where I can read about that? Because everything I've heard says that they COULDN'T vote no matter what, but it was commonly accepted that if they were given the right to vote it would come with the responsibility of being forced to enter the draft
is there a discussion currently in progress
And also many considered it to be a pointless right since everyone got married early back then, and 90% of them were just going to vote what their husband did anyways, so double the votes on both sides wasn't going to help them much
But yeah there was a lot of shit back then that still exists in the 3rd wave
Not even a discussion, since the answer is commonly accepted here.
ok
then I might be able to ask my weird scenario thingy
go for it
a group of white supremacist athletes form a badass team in order to *prove* white supremacy. the sport they play or league they play in doesn't matter, so long as it's one that is extremely popular and has plenty of strong competitors.
they are undefeated.
though they stay silent about their goal, especially in the public eye, their goal is revealed to the public through someone. perhaps their Twitter was hacked or something. this was definitely their goal, there is no question about that. however, afterwards, there is talk of permanently banning the team and its members from playing.
what do you think about this situation? should they be allowed to play? why or why not?
Well, should let them stay right? People play sports for their own reasons.
If a person does something, why should the intent matter as long as the action was good.
Maybe not good, more like, the action does not harm anybody.
To me that sounds like they're banning people for thought crimes
Well, and hopefully, that will inspire some non racists to prove them wrong.
Yeah, but playing against them and hosting them is going to likely ruin your business
A ban caused by someone having the wrong beliefs is not good.
I don't know enough about how sports leagues are structured
I've asked a few others about that
Why would it ruin it? wouldnt everyone turn out in droves to see the supremacists proven wrong?