Message from @Schedrevka

Discord ID: 465585315386621952


2018-07-08 02:19:33 UTC  

Too interconeccted. Thats how you get brownouts.

2018-07-08 03:46:39 UTC  

west US, east US and fucking Texas are the US electronic grid

2018-07-08 04:43:59 UTC  

It's actually rrgionalized a bit more than that

2018-07-08 07:27:33 UTC  

Whoa, that's odd to look at. One of FRCC area power companies just bought a SERC region power company. (Yeah, it doesn't really matter. It's just odd to think about.)

2018-07-08 07:35:06 UTC  

Though, thinking about it, Duke Energy was already in that position

2018-07-08 13:04:36 UTC  

sharing a vide in another channal reminded me of this vid which i think is applicable to the automation debate weve had a few times here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY8_F8I1Y_U

2018-07-08 14:01:10 UTC  

traps are gay prove me wrong

2018-07-08 14:05:12 UTC  

Thats not a trap. Its a flipping ambust

2018-07-08 17:48:23 UTC  

3rd wave feminism was good for social progress

discuss! 😛

2018-07-08 17:57:44 UTC  

list of subjective terms in that statement:
-3rd wave feminism
-good
-social progress

2018-07-08 17:58:34 UTC  

thats why its a debate my man 😛

2018-07-08 17:59:18 UTC  

The answer is already generally accepted here though

2018-07-08 17:59:39 UTC  

Like 1st wave, okay, 2nd wave, well guess so. 3rd wave, wtf is this.

2018-07-08 18:24:21 UTC  

^

2018-07-08 18:27:12 UTC  

1st and 2nd wave had a lot of questionable elements to them as well, we only remember the good ones

2018-07-08 18:28:05 UTC  

Like the suffragettes(NOT the suffragists) were terrorists at times. Firebombing buildings, throwing axes at politicians, defacing art, etc.

2018-07-08 18:28:06 UTC  

That is true.

2018-07-08 18:28:36 UTC  

Well, and that they could vote, if they served like men. Just that women were not required to be part of the draft.

2018-07-08 18:29:19 UTC  

Could they actually? I thought it was that most women didn't want the right to vote because it would've come with the draft

2018-07-08 18:29:49 UTC  

Which of course fuck them. They were denying others their rights because they didn't want them

2018-07-08 18:30:15 UTC  

Like I said, if the women signed up for the draft, which alot of them didnt, they would be able to vote as well.

2018-07-08 18:30:35 UTC  

It was a right they were willing to sacrifice for another.

2018-07-08 18:32:03 UTC  

Which is strange.

2018-07-08 18:32:18 UTC  

Like men still ahve to sign up, women dont have to,

2018-07-08 18:32:33 UTC  

Just wanting the perks but none of the responsibilities

2018-07-08 18:33:11 UTC  

Do you know any source where I can read about that? Because everything I've heard says that they COULDN'T vote no matter what, but it was commonly accepted that if they were given the right to vote it would come with the responsibility of being forced to enter the draft

2018-07-08 18:33:12 UTC  

is there a discussion currently in progress

2018-07-08 18:34:20 UTC  

And also many considered it to be a pointless right since everyone got married early back then, and 90% of them were just going to vote what their husband did anyways, so double the votes on both sides wasn't going to help them much

2018-07-08 18:35:12 UTC  

But yeah there was a lot of shit back then that still exists in the 3rd wave

2018-07-08 18:35:16 UTC  

Not even a discussion, since the answer is commonly accepted here.

2018-07-08 18:35:32 UTC  

ok

2018-07-08 18:35:40 UTC  

then I might be able to ask my weird scenario thingy

2018-07-08 18:35:58 UTC  

go for it

2018-07-08 18:36:33 UTC  

a group of white supremacist athletes form a badass team in order to *prove* white supremacy. the sport they play or league they play in doesn't matter, so long as it's one that is extremely popular and has plenty of strong competitors.

they are undefeated.

though they stay silent about their goal, especially in the public eye, their goal is revealed to the public through someone. perhaps their Twitter was hacked or something. this was definitely their goal, there is no question about that. however, afterwards, there is talk of permanently banning the team and its members from playing.

what do you think about this situation? should they be allowed to play? why or why not?

2018-07-08 18:37:20 UTC  

Well, should let them stay right? People play sports for their own reasons.

2018-07-08 18:37:45 UTC  

If a person does something, why should the intent matter as long as the action was good.

2018-07-08 18:38:11 UTC  

Maybe not good, more like, the action does not harm anybody.

2018-07-08 18:38:22 UTC  

To me that sounds like they're banning people for thought crimes

2018-07-08 18:38:23 UTC  

Well, and hopefully, that will inspire some non racists to prove them wrong.