Then it encourages risky behaviour

It also gives them a unfair advantage against smaller banks that wouldnt be bailed out

but wasn't it also a thing that the banks were forced to loan to people buying houses or something by the state?

i recall something like that having been done

We should exile those who burn the national flag to Liberia

Nah, Amendments before offense

Flag burning has come up as a 1st amendment issue several times.

As detestable as it is, the argument does tend to ultimately hold that when done as a protest it's a free speech issue.

I think people who argue for abolishing free speech should be sent to Liberia

Or anywhere without Free Speech, really

Cuba, Venezuela

https://thoughtcatalog.com/joshua-goldberg/2014/12/college-students-asking-for-censorship-is-a-thing/

Bear in mind this was 2014.

ive heard of this really great protest in the vietnam war

done by veterans agaisnt vietnam

where they were gonna put all of their medals in a bodybag and bring it to the door of the white house

tricky dicky errected a fence around teh whitehouse to stop tehm

then they decided they would jsut throw their medals over the door of teh fence

LOL nixon accidentally gave them arguably one of the best photo opportunities of the vietnam war protests

"disrespectful loyalty"

The fence never came down.

Question for yall

UBI, what do you think about it?

I'm in favor of it, I think it's going to be necessary to sustain capitalism at some point.

Highly against it, it will destroy society

only time UBI works, is when its no longer needed

No more than half of the job vanishing.

yes, but UBI will take with it the other half

No

Why bother working if you get sustainence for free?

what makes you think it wont Dennafen?

Because it's better to work than live off other people a leech.

And you think everyone thinks that way?

thats what UBI will be doing

You have a principle, that is good.

But it is incorrect t oassume you are the average

You can't just generate money
It needs resources tied to it

I agree, it would obviously be a tax.

which means that the rich

Yes the rich would be the ones taxed, but at some point soon we will have a vast number of people who though no fault of their own won't be able to have jobs at all.

yes, but that doesn't suddenly justify UBI, because UBI will be coming from those who achieve more than UBI as income

How does that not justify UBI.

What other means would they have to make money.