Message from @Joe_Limon
Discord ID: 492512101537939456
There's clearly Asians who don't do as well. But again, most Jews don't distinguish well, so the ones who aren't doing well stick out too.
Much harder to make conspiracies about them controlling things.
That's a good point
On the other hand, whites are a rather big group and Social Justice is basically a giant conspiracy theory about whites (still) conspiring keeping everyone else down
Asian is not both a religious group and an ethnicity
Unlike Jewish
I'm not sure that's really that important.
I mean, the masons are a conspiracy theory and they aren't either.
I think the attachment of a religion does make a difference
I agree with this. You can choose not to believe in something. If you are going to say the Asians are at it, it's a purely racist remark. With Jews you've got an ideology to point at too.
Exactly
In fact, I think everything is pointed at the ideology, and the ethnicity is a scapegoat for why someone they dislike is part of it or why they don't watch with an accusation.
But what is Jewish ideology and how is it that different than western ideology?
That doesn't matter when you don't like someone.
There is more of focus on putting other members of the ideology above other people I believe
Also they are something different, so if you encounter the "holier than thou" types, you can blame the difference in ideology as them just being smug
Cheers guys. Time for some sleep. Have a good night.
But then, Grenade, you could make the same argument about ethnic groups that tend to self-select too.
Which contradicts the religiousness is the key element.
Have there been any studies to date that show what percentage of iq/ability is due to culture and what is due to "scientific racism"?
I know Tim believes it is mostly cultural. But someone Like Stefan will pull numbers saying it is split around 20/80
That's because most of the studies he's found suggest 50% minimum. And I've found the same
However the cultural argument should also be, to lefties, racist
Which is probably why IQ is verboten
He meaning Stefan, not Tim
That said, IQ isn't perfect
I don't think IQ perfectly maps ones potential ability. It lacks nuance. However I do view it as a strong indicator for an individuals ability.
nobody says it maps perfectly to potential ability
highest number I've ever seen is like 86%
Look up studies on twins separated at birth.
That should give you some indication.
those are just case studies. There's larger studies with more data that still point towards considerable influence from gentics
Of course they're going to be case studies. I don't see there being a sudden upswell in the separated-at-birth-twins-who-subsequently-participate-in-IQ-studies numbers. 😄
Nevertheless, if there's enough of them you can see some potential indications.
right I'm just saying there's no sense in looking at less conclusive data
We need a study where one kid ends up in a jewish household and the other ends up in africa lol
wew
nope
im late
but the comment about the alt right being against corbyn, isnt true
I remember reading an article from the daily stormer about them supporting corbyn