sargon is low hanging fruitster
he can do more as he did but its too much effort
I doubt that Sargon is able to go higher than that.
I have no doubt that Styx is high IQ and very well versed and midly mannered...
But Richard Spencer mobed the Floor with Sargon. That's why he said that the Alt-Right is Irrelevant.
because they are mostly higher hanging fruit.
You might also look at the debate with the White Japanese....
Another WOrking Class English Man is "Tommy Robinson", and he did his homework really well, Sargon tries really hard but it does look like he reached his peak or almost did it.
i dont get why people like styx.
he only talks most basic shit and his political view is bit lacking.
like i dont think he sees big picture at all.
Because he usually has a bit different view of things than others....
like for me he seems one of those guys who read alot but just repeats what he reads. and cant formulate his own view.
and he doesn't give a fuck about left and right, he sees himself as a radical centrist
Sargon, yes, Styx no
styx has a talent for extemporaneous bullshitting. makes him seem like he knows more than he does when he's able to ramble continuously without stopping to think or correct himself.
Sargon's a liberal and for the most part liberals seem to be under the mistaken understanding that the left are seeking out some kind of compromise with Sargon's ilk
styx might seem smart to someone who doesnt know about topic he is talking about, because he repeats some info you havent heard before.
but he cant really think him self.
like yeah he might have some "new views" because he always thinks "truth" must always be in middle. but thats logical fallacy.
I like Styx the same way I like ReviewBrah, he has an unusual persona he's not afraid to present to the interwebs
Sort of how I like Tim's skateboarder persona as well, though his experience with investigative reporting is even more important.
@Stefan Payne well idk styx but spencer lost debate to sargon, it was obvious, too obvious
although sargon is an easy bait
and easy food
sadly i dont have a base so i cant debate sargon
Sargon was so bad, he can't won it, because he was a big asshole and constantly talked over Richard, laughed creepy and lost his calm a couple of times. So no, he lost the debate because of that.
investigative reporting is more blood warming than news critics, which sargon does well but he is a man of common folk and hopefully he is humble enough to know that
but there is difference betwen news reporting and political commentary.
and i dont really care about peoples personality. i care about truth.
wait is this about that old "what is white" debate.
When you ask why people like something you have ot prepared for the answer to be shallow
>sargon: what is white.
see i won that debate. kek.
whit is in group preference biological reality
``` he is humble enough to know that```
LOOOOOOL, no. See the Allsup video (though I've not seen it), but the existance of that video proves this claim wrong
does sargon think he is that good?
You can test in-group preference iwth monkeys or chimps or crows
i saw him being humble in front of peterson and few times in his videos
so yeah i assumed he was
like, james allsup?
that cunt that's reprimanding us brits for not getting a hard brexit, even though we can't cause May won't allow it?