By the way, Tim saying I know because her behavior. She's a psychology professor she might be capable of faking the behavior. And that was Tim's only "evidence". I don't have twitter or post on social media, but I didn't appreciate him saying that people who think she might be a sham are shit. Lindsey Graham pointed out that Feinstein office was recommending a lawyer to Ford before august 20 when he met with Feinstein meaning Ford was prepping about a month before they revealed the allegation. Ford could have declined to be involved or voiced her lack of confidence in it being Kavanaugh but chose to at that time go in on the political stunt before she got coaching as Tim speculates. Even if something real happened to Ford at some point, most evidence points to her being a political operative in this instance. This is where Tim blind spot is revealed.
Does anyone know any good reporters for these sexual assault cases? This seems to be an area that's a real blind spot for a lot of people covering the news (not just Tim). Shapiro is pretty bad on this as well, Philly eat a D isn't great either, and a lot of others don't cover it (I don't blame them).

Can pls ask someone Ben if he is a Siscon?

He said a couple of times that his sister was the one who introduced his wife to him....

The thing to remember with Tim's stance is that, unless you can find the info to say "there is no way she could have been in that area during that time and she knows it", it's hard to prove she is actually lying. However, for him to actually declare she is lying opens him up to slander.

There is also the fact that someone, with a very similar style story may be discouraged if the default response they all see on the news is "clearly women who have blocked out memories are just lying for some kind of gains or revenge". The easiest way for Tim to avoid all these pitfalls is to simply say "whoever assaulted her wasn't Kav, and the Dems clearly have been using this for political gains at her experense"

Declaring her guilty without evidence is no better than declaring Kav guilty without evidence. And unfortunately, the beauty of her allegation is that it is very hard to prove she lied. And if you really want to prove she had ill intent, follow the money. Her attorney is working for free, so follow that go fund me money.

And tim fucks rabbits

See its not Tim’s job to prove he’s not a rabbit rapist

Its my job to show he’s a bunny fucker

If i cant then I should not be belived

but you might not be lying

you may very well have seen him fuck a rabbit.

but didn't take a video or a pitcutr

You are right so we should stop watching tim because of the allegation

Btw I saw you fucking the rabbit too

Grenade is correct

My problem is with tim saying she's honest, she's not. He could just say her claims are not credible.

Because she wasn't proven a liar in her accusations.

Perjury is a crime.

perjury is hard to prove

Innocent until proven guilty is in effect though

are the media and dems treating him like he's innocent?

And so we do to others what we don't want done to us?

It's apparent and provable that the left is playing a political game with the accusation

Die with principles huh?

We can accuse them, but to difinitively state that she is lying on all counts, that nothing ever happened to her

That's Bullshit.

I want the burden of proof to be held above my claims and everyone else’s I dont believe shit unless i have evidence and anyone who does believes without evidence is a twat

Don't need to say she's lying. just that the claims have no credibility

the "claims"

Well why did you rape me

Why

I'm pretty sure Tim's said that much.

Tims saying shes honest = telling truth

About being a victim

Why did all of you run a train on me

😦

I agree, I do think she was a victim

Not enough crying, fati

Do you believe her claims about airplanes?

😢