appologies if it seems I'm putting words into his mouth, all my comments are of course my opinion

I was hoping he'd respond

The accuser should have some leeway in evidence not because they are female or gay or something but due to how hard evidence is to find. Even then; there should be some evidence or multiple witnesses with the exception of very rare cases.

And the witnesses must be credible

if they report it you know, withing 30 years of the accusation

*must

act*

I fixed my msg

I fall back on "better 10 guilty go free than 1 innocent is imprisoned"

I remember when the left used to stand for this too

did you hear 2 men have come forward claiming it was them not Kavenagh?

What?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a1dtcZrPWY&lc=z23etxnzuwygclasqacdp4340ksk3vshdjo1qxkffh1w03c010c.1538482223223662

thats Sargon

just watching it

yeah I watch some of his stuff

its in USA today

I like Sargon but I feel recently he has been getting more partisan

he is covering it in the first couple of minutes of that vid

That's probably why he decided to take a break

nah the left is just getting more extreme

No I don't mean that

he is certainly getting more political but he is still a centre left in his views

I mean before he used to say some things to clarify his stance and say sympathetic things to some people in groups who were suffering as a result of radical left beliefs

ahh

but now he doesn't really do that

probably tied of using caveats every time he speaks lol

actually you just made me realise something

Tim is probably just covering his own arse to avoid backlash

thats more likely than he being sexist

so thanks 😃

why?

do u mean

backlash from who?

from the left

if he didnt say he believed her he'd be in the crosshairs

I had assumed that's what you meant

thats more logical a conclusion than actual positive discrimination.

legit, thanks for engaging on this. you made me think it through in a different way

k

but yeah I agree on sargon being more full on these days and a bit less compassionate