@grant I believe this was the argument back before alcohol. I want to say with opium back when it was smoked in pipes at opium dens/bars/whatever.

I'd imagine though Larry Elder simply understands that there isn't any kind of explicit permission for government to make those laws. Those fall under the concept of unenumerated rights

One day Tim Will become a constitutional constructionist. I'm willing to bet on it

Then he'll be a libertarian

Before you even know it

Just wait. One day I believe he will see the superiority of constitutional constructionism. (Literalism)

My issue with @Timcast report on the Kavenah stuff is Tim comes out as a sexist.
"I believe her more than him" so you beleive her based on the fact she is a woman Tim, thats textbook sexism. you should wieght them equally if you are not sexist.

I get he is trying to be compassionate however its actual sexism.

Another prediction. (Though it's already happening). The Democrats start looking for specific statements to try and push the narrative that there is a conspiracy and Kavanaugh is lying. Specifically, they'll look to accuse him of perjury which serves the dual purpose of making him look bad and sets up for later impeachment or criminal proceedings if he were to be nominated.

The specific statements will be borderline. Stuff like dodges or guilt by association issues.

They're ruthless.

I still think this played terribly for the Democrats with anyone right of Bernie Sanders

They are already doing that Pratel

They are trying to paint him as "angry"

The entire thing was to get him to testify so that they can pick it apart.

Seems he lied about his connections to Yale.

@Jes I think he said that because statisically one is more likely to accuse someone of something they did actually do

@Tal,Karpov,AlekhineAllCoolGuys well I'd love to hear it from the horses mouth. it comes accross as sexism.

I believe because of sex

is sexism

I don't think he said that though

but its just one of the many things I'd love to discuss with @Timcast

maybe you can get such an idea from what he said

he gave no reason for his belief at any point

but he never directly said that

no he didnt you are right. he gave no reason at all as to why he beleives her but he did say he beleives her more than him

the only logical reason I can conclude (and please correct me) is he is being sexist

its positive discrimination which is still discrimination

either women have the same rights and responsibilities as men or they dont

It might also simply be due to it being a sexual crime; which is very different than other crimes

if they do you can just believe one or the other

oh yeah, if he is guilty, burn him at the stake

if she made it up she should do prison time

and yes, thats me judging the crime of abuse above lying

I do however disagree with openly saying that one believes one over the other even if one inheritly feels one is more likely to be guilty; because that is not very objective

all men positivly discriminate in favour of women

Not all

at some point or another

That's a bit much

not malitiously

Misogny is seen as a big thing in msm which is false but it does exist in some places

look at prison sentancing men vs women for the same crime

the majority