With the fellow rapists
Polyarcho-capitalism is best ism.
"Part of our present difficulty is that we must constantly adjust our lives, our thoughts and our emotions, in order to live simultaneously within the different kinds of orders according to different rules. If we were to apply the unmodified, uncurbed, rules of the micro-cosmos (i.e. of the small band or troop, or of, say, our families) to the macro-cosmos (our wider civilisation), as our instincts and sentimental yearnings often make us wish to do, we would destroy it. Yet if we were always to apply the rules of the extended order to our more intimate groupings, we would crush them. So we must learn to live in two sorts of world at once."
"We must promote the idea of secession. Or more specifically, we must promote the idea of a world composed of tens of thousands of distinct districts, regions, and cantons, and hundred of thousands of independent free cities such as the present day oddities of Monaco, Andorra, San Marino, Liechtenstein, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Greatly increased opportunities for economically motivated migration would thus result, and the world would be one of small [classically] liberal governments economically integrated through free trade and an international commodity money such as gold."
I was reading some comments on Tims vids last night on Bitchute. This problem comes up a lot and in many forms and I see hypocrisy from all sides.
When a Muslim kills a bunch of ppl the 'left' and other Muslims declare they are not 'real' Muslims. The 'right' and 'red pilled' (for lack of a better term for ppl on the left and centre that know what's going on) disagree and call them Muslims.
When a liberal does something stupid like try and kick a woman in the face the right declare liberalism to be a mental illness and the 'red pilled' say this isn't real liberalism.
When a right-winger drives his car into a crowd of ppl the 'left' declare the right violent terrorists and the right say 'he's not with us.
Feminists declare anti-feminists woman haters and misogynists they they can point to numerus videos of ppl calling themselves anti-feminists calling for woman to lose the right to vote. 'They're the extremists' is cried.
Anit-feminists call feminists man haters and can point to the numerus articles declaring men to be the one cause of all problems in the world. 'They're the radical TERFs, they're not proper feminists' is the excuse.
My question is, what gives us the right to declare what someone else believes and how they identify themselves?
I think we need to work this out. the 'oh so #notall matters now does it' is an argument used by both sides and rightly so.
You better not try and be a supreme court justice
@Poppy Rider I go by peoples actions, not their words. lies are easy - actions are evident.
If the ideology and actions align, they are real "insert group here"
Collectivism is most evil thing, m'lady.
the other issue with words is people dont generally understand what a specific phrase is used for. Alt right used to be an alternative type of conservative - not a neocon ect. now it means ethno nationalist
so by the time normies start using a word in common parlance the meaning has distorted
dont seed the ligual ground.
My party is the sons of liberty
Its an oldie but a goodie
All the founding members died but I’m restarting it
@Poppy Rider someone constantly on the defense can't strike back very well. It's a tactic
ya i got fucked a bit socially when alt right changed from neocon to white nationalists, i was going around telling people alt righters werent that bad lol
Milo got stung by it.
not sure if ignorance on my part or fault of fuckery with definitions everybody else did
he was the poster boy for the trolly alt right, 2 years on its ethno
its 1984 basics. control the language control the people
We live in a society
All milo wanted was an ethnostate a place were white babies are welcome and happas murdered
Horseshoe theory was a shit debate primarily because it views politics as existing on one axis. Amusingly, its critics often did the same as its proponents
Cory booker is a retard dont change my mind
How dare you call #Sparticus a retard
No True Muslim fallacy
Hypothetical question time. If we assume Brett sexually assaulted Ford in the manner described. Who is the bigger victim? Would the consequence of getting half the country to believe you are a predator and thus receive continuous death threats and having your daughters/family continually harassed about a terrible choice you made in your teens be justified? Or is that victim blaming? Where Bretts victimization from media, politicians and the public at large cannot be blamed on Brett?
The biggest victim is the 14th amendment
I was thinking 4th, 5th, and 6th
One of those amendments anyway
If Brett is the greater victim. And we #believethevictim... What does that mean?
Maybe he had it coming for being a beer-swilling chad