Hello, please allow me to introduce myself. I am a Pleb. But that doesn't matter. I was hoping that someone here could educate me on an older topic. I understand that the separating of children from parents at the border has stopped due to an executive order but I was wondering if anyone had sources to find out exactly what was happening to the parents and the children after being separated from each other?

Adults and children are held in separate facilities as they're processed. Adults are held until their hearings for asylum go through or they are deported. Children are held until they can be placed with a non-imprisoned relative, if none are found they go into the foster care system.

https://www.usatoday.com/pages/interactives/graphics/deportation-explainer/

Thank you.

Global consciousness is a real phenomenon.

And meme magic is one of its examples, but there are numerous.

Religion is the most fundamental and pronounced example of group consciousness.

Group consciousness is nothing more than a shared perspective on reality.

The great psychologist and gnostic Jung discusses the idea of group consciousness and depth psychology extensively.

I would say that Manifest Destiny is another good example of an effectively applied group consciousness.

There's also the concepts of Chivalry and Bushido. Even though their founding was 6 centuries apart. They did formulate in two radically different parts of the world and held similar yet vastly different concepts.

They are two different expressions of feudalism.

Yes. It is easy to suggest that people, although from different walks of life and cultures, look at similar problems and come up with similar responses.

It is, it is also interesting to then note how well the Japanese were able to Westernize and quickly move away from feudalism.

I think Feudalism is inherently flawed and everyone recognized those flaws but they didn't have a better solution at the time. Until a new system was introduced and the people quickly adopted the new values simply because they saw it as inherently better. Perhaps not consciously, but it was a quick adoption due to just having a better idea. I think Jungian philosophy and theory is fascinating but I also believe it can be explained not through a shared subconscious but through people being people and even though our cultures are different we still have the same thought processes and with enough time and proper healthy debate will come to the same conclusions logically.

But I must to bed now. I have a busy day tomorrow and the hour is growing late.

We need a new holy crusade

We need to invade Venezuela

And Europe will start with SWeDeN

retake Constantinople

retake Antioch

retake Alexandria

restore the Pentarchate.

What a crazy story that was.

https://www.nytimes.com/1992/12/16/world/fischer-is-indicted-over-chess-match.html

Bobby Fischer in exile.

if only

we had the library of alexandria

Extradition on copyright grounds is cancer.

https://thatdailymusicblog.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/extradition-a-dangerous-precedent-for-the-digital-age/

We have been here before. But we never learn:

"March 15, 1982: This UPI report so dated begins: “Calgary police said Monday they are concerned with the increasing number of women reporting unfounded rapes and may consider laying public mischief charges.”"

"January-February 1982: False rape statistics for Calgary, Canada, the first two months of the year. There were nineteen reported rapes, seven of them turning out to be false. Not unfounded, but false."

All studies conducted before the memory holing of feminism indicate a rate of false rape allegations of about 40-80% at times.

https://www.infotextmanuscripts.org/falserape/false-rape-3842.pdf

Reclaim Byzantium!

@Timcast, the civility you seek doesn’t appear on the ballot; no choice on it will reverse the trend.

Actions have consequences:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUUR0000SA0R

Women stating "pay me or I'll say you raped me" are practicing extortion - a crime in many places. Men would do well to get it recorded or documented and go to the police immediately to file a report.

Who in their right mind would debate that?

Debate what?

So far as the numbers of founded vs. unfounded reports, that we will never know. Unfounded reports include intentionally filed false reports as well as ones which turned out not to have occurred but the victim may have had reason to believe it did. Examples of this is if you are drunk, have sex and black out recalling nothing. You can't know if you had drunk sex in which you were a willing participant or if you were taken advantage of while passed out. Both things do occur. In other cases it might be for example if you had parked your vehicle and return to discover it missing. The presumption made is that someone stole it but it also could have been towed, repossessed or relocated due to an event.

Then we also can't know how many reports are founded when it comes to this. The nature of the crime means there will seldom be video or audio. Any outside interaction may not be representative of what occurred behind closed doors. Through further interaction fences can be mended and bridges burned.

Further any evidence gained doesn't immediately indicate a crime as regular sexual intercourse can cause the very same things, tenderness, soreness, tearing and so on. Some men and women also enjoy things a bit risqué which people might think were criminal. It ends up being she said and he said. So some reports may indeed be marked unfounded not because a crime didn't occur but because we lack evidence to say one did. Visa versa, circumstances could indicate one occurred when one in fact didn't.

You end up with a situation where few are proven one way or another while the vast majority linger due to insufficient information. Then those in either side could very well be wrongly placed merely due to circumstance. It's not something we'll ever have truly accurate numbers for. The best way to handle the situation though is to continue investigating claims as crimes until we have more information but record them differently. Instead of recording them as these crimes occurred record them as this many allegations have been levied. Then break it down further by how many were convicted and how many reports are marked unfounded.