Message from Faticati in Subverse #debate

2018-11-26 14:43:54 UTC  

thats not what I asked

2018-11-26 14:45:15 UTC  

Given that Jim is big on guilt by association, why does he not absolutely destroy JF and Ralph, given that both are guilty of the shit he claims to hate? Why does he choose to associate with them?

2018-11-26 14:45:46 UTC  

He is in no way a fan of guilt by association

2018-11-26 14:46:04 UTC  

He is a fan of guilt by being guilty

2018-11-26 14:46:18 UTC  

Like sargon being in krauts discord

2018-11-26 14:46:34 UTC  

And having knowledge of the gay doxing server

2018-11-26 14:47:34 UTC  

he was blaming Vee for shit "his buddies" were doing. In his little fit on Vee's stream he absolutely did fall back on guilt by association, and when it was pointed out that this didnt work given his friends, he made that comment on rolling in the shit to take other people down

2018-11-26 14:47:58 UTC  


2018-11-26 14:48:44 UTC somewhere in this fucking stream

2018-11-26 14:52:32 UTC  
2018-11-26 14:57:20 UTC  

4 minutes into this one is where soygon implies jim is a pedo for pedo hunting

2018-11-26 14:57:38 UTC  

Im not watching a whole stream

2018-11-26 14:57:51 UTC  

I got the timestamp you do the same

2018-11-26 14:58:16 UTC  

Jim's on that stream for like 10 minutes and I've got other shit to do anyway

2018-11-26 14:59:47 UTC  

You sleepy sargon?

2018-11-26 15:03:14 UTC  

>everyone who disagrees with me is Sargon
What are you, a twitter thot?

2018-11-26 15:04:41 UTC  

No its called funny

2018-11-26 15:04:46 UTC  

Also as far as I'm aware the argument was not that Jim only had young viewers, just that he had goaded his young viewers into doing his dirty work. I don't really care either way, because Sargon is full of shit a good chunk of the time anyway, but going for analytics to disprove that is some potato shit

2018-11-26 15:05:17 UTC  

Cuz sargon always gets sleepy when he is losing and now someone defending him also cant be bothered to make a cohesive argument

2018-11-26 15:05:41 UTC  

It's 10 minutes of a stream m8

2018-11-26 15:05:47 UTC  

Yeah facts are some potato shit

2018-11-26 15:06:05 UTC  

It's almost all Jim talking. As one of his groomed children you should love that :^)

2018-11-26 15:07:35 UTC  

I wish to speak with the voice that makes 1000 pedophiles run in fear

2018-11-26 15:07:47 UTC  

And makes all the skeptics beg for mercy

2018-11-26 15:07:58 UTC  

From what I'm seeing, they've provided a citation for their argument, while you've basically told them to look for your evidence for you.

2018-11-26 15:10:01 UTC  

This is some cringy shit. Maybe Jim really *does* have a potato squad :^)

2018-11-26 15:18:04 UTC  

Btw your link isnt working @Beemann

2018-11-26 15:20:03 UTC  

@Bookworm he has yet to give me a link that works

2018-11-26 15:20:12 UTC  
2018-11-26 15:20:36 UTC  

Ah there we go, an s got clipped out during copy/paste

2018-11-26 15:28:32 UTC  

ok so jim told vee he was a hypocrite and your issue was?

2018-11-26 15:31:17 UTC  

As jim said “this is why I’m better than you if i have to be in the sewers to drag you in with me i don’t care”

2018-11-26 15:32:05 UTC  

Sorry jim isn’t some big brained liberalist he just wants to fuck the skeptics cuz of their incest bs

2018-11-26 15:48:51 UTC  

Vees issue was saying he has no knowledge of krauts doxing server and then later admitting full knowledge of it and being in the doxing server

2018-11-26 15:55:28 UTC  

Lol no, Jim implied Vee was responsible because his friends were in the discord (where, from what I've been hearing, the doxxing didn't actually take place) and as such Vee must have known more than he claims. Meanwhile Jim hangs out with people who assault police and sexually harass wahmen

2018-11-26 15:55:54 UTC  

Vee was saying, and I would agree, that Jim shouldn't be held responsible for people like JF and Ralph

2018-11-26 15:56:31 UTC  

And Jim made that retarded ass comment about how if money is being made you're affiliated
While Jim had been involved in IBS streams for ages
Not a good stance to take

2018-11-27 00:18:35 UTC  

@Timcast Your comment about "unfettered capitalism" and pollution is misinformed. It was government, not the market, which enabled pollution at scale into commons. Disregarding their role as arbiter of private property disputes. When people brought businesses to court over air and water pollution early in the industrial revolution it was government which said that it was OK because it was for the benefit of all.

2018-11-27 00:20:08 UTC  

It's fine if you think it'd happen even if there was free market courts but history shows that businesses got away with polluting because governments allowed it.

2018-11-27 00:28:12 UTC  

There is also the whole "pollution is stinky and people prefer their planet to not be stinky" that capitalism would eventually take care of.

2018-11-27 00:29:04 UTC  

pollution got out of hand during the industrial revolution to the early 50s partly because until then we were basically..more worried about actually eating and not dying than we were about the long term effects of industry..cause people weren't really living long enough to care.