I am not trying to be a dick but I don't understand what you put in.

I got to go, IRL stuff.

night Pratel

No, the reach to conclude that this meme point that was made, and is being sold as a confirmed attribution to this female FN member, so as to establish certainty in their motives, but isnt by any means confirmed

Is bad judgement

Ok. The source of the meme is to me unknown. However it was sent out by someone who had access to video taken onsite. That means someone who was party to the events, faction unknown. That was the first thing.

Intial statements made by members of the FNG support the meme but correct it so that the short video clips can be used.

Do you have a link to those , I'm trying to establish they're initial state.ents

https://www.snopes.com/ap/2019/01/19/students-in-maga-hats-mock-native-american-after-rally/

good night

Sorry had company. Is there any links to initial claims by the native march attendees, that the youth group had made the approach, and not the nathan Phillip's guy walking up to them?

why is it that the only source so many news outlets use is AP? CBC/BBC/CNN/Snopes they all use the single interviews done by AP instead of sending their own reporters out. Have News outlets become that lazy?

yes

and they suffer for it

It's been this way for a long time. People assume the different news sources are different. In truth, they usually republish the AP. This often includes Fox News.

Look for AP attributions and bizarrely similar language and details across news companies. Once you see it, it becomes uncanny.

I've joked for some time about lefties who will reject an AP article if it's reprinted by Breitbart.

we have a means

Yo, opinions, is this freshie "stateless socialist" brave for actually attending and asking questions at a right wing event? https://youtu.be/Y9O-NoccXQQ

brave ?

umm socialism is everyone owns the labor of everyone

lol

Equal access to everyone is equal amounts of enslavement.

yeah, because whoever coordinates that equalization is the one with actual power

communism makes it the government

and that's USUALLY what happens in socialism

https://medium.com/@AspieSavant/16-basis-principles-of-mass-indoctrination-8ee8b179cf4a

The voting thing is false though.

Also, the picture for 14 has things somewhat reversed

somewhat false. The reason why Trump got in is because the republicans got complacent, expecting RINOs vs Neolibs to go on forever. Pretty much everyone expected the public to reject him. By the time the republicans considered Bern'ing him it would have been suicidal to do so

Alternatively, everyone in the political world knew about Clinton's dirt and expected campaigners to sabotage her through over confidence, if so it never actually mattered who the Republican candidate was so they might as well have had some fun with Trump

That's why I didn't vote in the 2016 election. I probably would have voted for Bernie if he had won the nomination, but at the time I knew too much about Clinton to want to vote for her, and I had bought in to enough of the anti-Trump narrative that I didn't want to vote for him either.

the right had no way of berning him, the republicans have been in a state of fragmentation since the end of the bush administration, they arnt a united order with supreme power of political manipulation the same way the dnc was, bernie WAS very populer as a canadate against hillery at all points during his campaign as trump was on the republican side, but the republican side, they were both consitered outsiders by their respective partys, the big difference was the solidarity to focus the most onto a single canadate that the dnc had which the republicans did not have, not to mention the republicans kinda wanted to win so as the underdog they went with what was the best chance where the dnc went with what was most safe for them

I feel like you're forgetting the pushback against Trump from establishment Republicans. They hated him and wanted to replace him, but they couldn't because of the momentum he had. NeverTrumpers. Bernie got the treatment he did because, for all her faults, Hillary was a viable candidate (as evidenced by the amount of votes she pulled). As much as people like to wave the Sanders flag, I think he would have genuinely lost harder against Trump. Ultimately the Republicans' overall weakness is precisely what allowed Trump to shit all over their preferred candidates and hijack their ticket, they just didn't realize what would happen until it was too late

I disagree, a lot of bernie supporters just plain didn't vote or voted for Trump because of the DNCs handling of the entire event.
Clinton may have had a lot of votes, but how many of those were from states like California where most of them were not needed to get all the electoral collage votes.

This was written in another server by a person who is in their own words an "abolish private property" socialist
Those kids are problematic. They were being extremely rude and mocking an Indigenous man. I don’t think that his chanting—which was fairly intense—was well-advised, but it wasn’t the worst thing. You can see in one video the kids getting a little weirded out and not sure how to respond. I think if a few kids hadn’t started some chanting, they would have all stopped. But they didn’t. They decided to go along with it, surround him, and jump up and down while mock-chanting to the beat he was drumming. I’m not sure if this was racist or stupid high school boy shit but neither is appropriate. They could have decided to not follow along with that behavior and they chose poorly.

I’m a little tired of journalists pretending like every little detail dramatically changes the narrative surrounding a story. It’s dishonest reporting and bullshit, quite frankly. And this often comes from centrists and people who aren’t as liberal as they think they are, which possibly tells you something about the spin put into these. I agree that there is a lot of fake outrage passed off in the news cycle from both the right and left, and I don’t think this story is worthy of the attention it’s getting, but so much of this “there are new angles” thing is bullshit. While I disagree with the conclusions of the Atlantic article on this whole debacle, I do agree that it’s a bit of a Rorschach test—you see what you want to see. But that isn’t because it gives little information. It’s because people have political views that guide what they focus on, and unfortunately it seems like most journalists want so badly to try to get past this that they miss the forest for the trees. And that’s worrying considering they’re who we get our news from.

Just so everyone here has a glimpse into the mind of how the far left perceived the situation

... I assume they ignored any additional information that was released?

like the now known facts that the indians marched up to and into the crowd of students in the first place?

Fuck anyone who says "problematic" instantly you just know a load of bs is coming