Message from @balticnapo
Discord ID: 399255967990153216
Man the 10-minute time limit is pointless
look, Koris in the house
Hallo
Bruce
Did he give you Emoji powers
also, you guys need an faq/rules section asap
The first thing Kori wants is emojis lol.
YE
I have some that won't be racy as well
@WOODY Yeah, but not a damn wall of text rule pages.
So as to not offend tim pools audience
yes, keep the rules brief
No spamming, no doxxing, be reasonable.
Follow the discord policys so we all get along.
There are some example rules.
thats a good start
Well, add in shit that isnt common sense
Well actually, its probably not that common though if people have to be reminded sooo
>no doxing
ZERO'S WAIFU IS YUKIE
Common sense isn't common.
Kori, no!!
What have you done?!
>I have an anime avatar
you have to be explicit with your rules though, as ambiguous rules are designed to be broken. If you want to create a healthy discourse, you need objective rules that can easily be judged by moderators.
<:yukie_smile:350106585864994826>
So shit like no hatespeech isnt a good rule since its subjective
exactly
No commie speech
thats what Tim's video today was saying
Nor is it good for someone who is explicitly free speech.
Yeah, a much better rule than "No hate speech" would be "No speech", because that's purely objective. You can't talk.
:D
We need context.
Silence is golden I guess
But duct tape is silver
Xd
even better, tape them mouths shut, silence
Still, i will be here for the chaos, assuming that actually happens. Sorry for the debbie downer, but Ive seen it happen pleanty so best of luck to the mod and future mods
@balticnapo max raises a good point in that video, but you are missing the point. The point is not whether or not the rules are objective, the point is that we should be striving to get as close as possible to an objective set of rules, and since this is a discord server linked directly to Tim, it shouldn't be that hard to find a set of rules that we agree on the necessity of, because we are likely coming from a similar point of principle, i.e. something close to the principles of freedom of speech and free discussion. Keeping that in mind, that is what we should design the rules to protect.