Message from @LotheronPrime

Discord ID: 404023368522924032


2018-01-19 19:26:08 UTC  

Go over shit that is not big enough for one vid?

2018-01-19 19:27:10 UTC  

it doesnt need structure honestly, but has that conversational tone/interaction with donators

2018-01-19 19:27:58 UTC  

Or answer questions that get brought up. Like dailywire and their mailbag sessions

2018-01-19 19:29:41 UTC  

ye and he can bring his opinions up as opposed to unbiased reporting, YT severely lacks a consumer->creator line unless you stream, for whatever reason

2018-01-19 19:30:30 UTC  

tbh youtube should seperate itself from google as a brand

2018-01-19 19:31:15 UTC  

barely anybody refers to youtube as a company anymore, they just say google

2018-01-19 19:32:47 UTC  

Thing is whoever is running the show isnt the most competant

2018-01-19 19:34:16 UTC  

referring to the CEO?

2018-01-19 19:34:33 UTC  

probably due to the 40+ hours of weekly sensitivity training

2018-01-19 19:34:56 UTC  

have they reduced the amount?

2018-01-19 19:35:27 UTC  

No shit?

2018-01-19 19:37:34 UTC  

I exaggerate, but google seems committed to things that arent exactly utilitarian

2018-01-19 19:38:47 UTC  

where did we start? ah... ad-videos on sundays... yes, monitor the views, make sure you don't sound like you want to bullshit people, 30 second donation ads might work at the end of videos but not as a replacement of sponsored, weekly stream with a partner (that does not just agree with you) might be a good idea... did i miss something?

2018-01-19 19:39:59 UTC  

I mean they are behaving exactly how you would expect concidering they have a monopoly and virtually no incentive to imrpove their products

2018-01-19 19:41:58 UTC  

they do give engineers a lot more room to improve the end products compared to other shady companies like Microsoft, Apple, etc

2018-01-19 19:42:24 UTC  

besides the core functionality of youtube and google ofc

2018-01-19 19:42:54 UTC  

the rest of their products get regular improvements and aren't too beurocratic

2018-01-19 19:44:28 UTC  

they also contribute quite a bit to extremely useful open source projects that don't actually make them money currently such as https://www.dartlang.org/ https://flutter.io/

2018-01-19 19:44:49 UTC  

i'd say TensorFlow but they use it quite a bit internally and it's integrated pretty heavily into a few GCP products

2018-01-19 21:24:08 UTC  

End fake news? not a chance

2018-01-19 21:24:37 UTC  

would be nice if journalists in general had integrity for the truth

2018-01-19 21:24:48 UTC  

too bad it's all agenda based these days

2018-01-19 21:47:18 UTC  

In theory, once AI becomes advanced enough, we could use them as impartial editors/curators for news

2018-01-19 21:47:48 UTC  

The problem is, by the time AI becomes advanced enough to do that, the people creating them will have ways of making the AI think it's unbiased even though it is

2018-01-19 21:48:38 UTC  

I don't think we'll ever get to that point, since rarely are events ever so cut-and-dry.

2018-01-19 21:49:08 UTC  

AI will completely miss the nuance and spirit of a situation, placing only the cold hard facts in their place.

2018-01-19 21:49:47 UTC  

I don't think AI is or will be capable of understanding context, basically.

2018-01-19 21:50:14 UTC  

Maybe not in our lifetime

2018-01-19 21:50:18 UTC  

It will eventually though

2018-01-19 22:02:21 UTC  

We, ourselves, are essentially biological machines. I'm sure at some point in the extremely far away future, we'll reach the point in which we can create AIs that are on par, or superior to human beings. But that's nowhere near our lifetime, for sure.

Then again, maybe not. It _is_ just speculation, after all.

2018-01-19 23:02:11 UTC  

My parents may live to see self driving cars become normal, or almost normal. Don't underestimate technology as I'm sure my parents would have thought self driving cars were something of science fiction well beyond their lifetime

2018-01-19 23:12:29 UTC  

I think it's safe to say that is not quite a fair comparison, since there's a difference between self-driving cars following a map, and an AI capable of reason and understanding nuance and context.

Flying bitcoin cars when

2018-01-19 23:50:45 UTC  

@JadenFrostwolf you say that now. My parents are in their late 60s

2018-01-19 23:51:34 UTC  

There is a difference between the tech that got us to he moon with less power than a calculator and a car that can do a bit more than follow a map.

2018-01-19 23:52:14 UTC  

Except we had more than just tech with less power than a calculator which got us to the moon: us.

2018-01-19 23:52:27 UTC  

Remember, we're biological machines, remember?

2018-01-19 23:53:41 UTC  

We got ourselves to the moon using limited technology, but we were the ones that created and used those tools, and ultimately actually got to the moon.

2018-01-20 00:41:26 UTC  

AI would make a fantastic filter for biased reporting, incorporating online trends, buzzwords and obvious subjective qualifiers would flag every MSM article pretty much

2018-01-20 00:42:37 UTC  

Exactly.
An AI is only as unbiased as the one in control of it.

2018-01-20 01:06:16 UTC  

Humans have been trying to replicate ourselves, duplicate a better version of ourselves, ever since we first started making tools. Look at how far we have come in just 50 years. 50 years. A little.over half an average human lifespan. I find it hard to believe some kind of near human intelligence AI will not happen in my life time just looking back at how far we have already come in such a short time.