if he found an engaging partner, a weekly stream could get some $$ too

Streaming hearthstone and chill?

no FUCK hearthstone, I meant talking about events for the week

a recap of sorts?

the whole point of his second channel I guess, but for his main one

things covered, uncovered, and answering Qs

Would like to see things that the MSM refuses to cover. Could be interesting.

A good one hour is good enough I guess

Go over shit that is not big enough for one vid?

it doesnt need structure honestly, but has that conversational tone/interaction with donators

Or answer questions that get brought up. Like dailywire and their mailbag sessions

ye and he can bring his opinions up as opposed to unbiased reporting, YT severely lacks a consumer->creator line unless you stream, for whatever reason

tbh youtube should seperate itself from google as a brand

barely anybody refers to youtube as a company anymore, they just say google

Thing is whoever is running the show isnt the most competant

referring to the CEO?

probably due to the 40+ hours of weekly sensitivity training

have they reduced the amount?

No shit?

I exaggerate, but google seems committed to things that arent exactly utilitarian

where did we start? ah... ad-videos on sundays... yes, monitor the views, make sure you don't sound like you want to bullshit people, 30 second donation ads might work at the end of videos but not as a replacement of sponsored, weekly stream with a partner (that does not just agree with you) might be a good idea... did i miss something?

I mean they are behaving exactly how you would expect concidering they have a monopoly and virtually no incentive to imrpove their products

they do give engineers a lot more room to improve the end products compared to other shady companies like Microsoft, Apple, etc

besides the core functionality of youtube and google ofc

the rest of their products get regular improvements and aren't too beurocratic

they also contribute quite a bit to extremely useful open source projects that don't actually make them money currently such as https://www.dartlang.org/ https://flutter.io/

i'd say TensorFlow but they use it quite a bit internally and it's integrated pretty heavily into a few GCP products

End fake news? not a chance

would be nice if journalists in general had integrity for the truth

too bad it's all agenda based these days

In theory, once AI becomes advanced enough, we could use them as impartial editors/curators for news

The problem is, by the time AI becomes advanced enough to do that, the people creating them will have ways of making the AI think it's unbiased even though it is

I don't think we'll ever get to that point, since rarely are events ever so cut-and-dry.

AI will completely miss the nuance and spirit of a situation, placing only the cold hard facts in their place.

I don't think AI is or will be capable of understanding context, basically.

Maybe not in our lifetime

It will eventually though

We, ourselves, are essentially biological machines. I'm sure at some point in the extremely far away future, we'll reach the point in which we can create AIs that are on par, or superior to human beings. But that's nowhere near our lifetime, for sure.

Then again, maybe not. It _is_ just speculation, after all.

My parents may live to see self driving cars become normal, or almost normal. Don't underestimate technology as I'm sure my parents would have thought self driving cars were something of science fiction well beyond their lifetime

I think it's safe to say that is not quite a fair comparison, since there's a difference between self-driving cars following a map, and an AI capable of reason and understanding nuance and context.

Flying bitcoin cars when