you said the group i defined, was loosely defined

I wish gifs were postable in this one, popcorn.gif

so, rebelious youth

They are trying to be unique by acting the way they do so expecting us to define them as something specific is near impossible. Most we can do is group them by the tendencies most of them have.

Younglings that act like stereotypes

i don't think having a rebellious personality means they have no personality and define themselves by a pre-written identity

unless thats not what you said

except thats how you worded it

i didn't say they have a rebellious personality

i said they define themselves by the current status of "rebel" which in the normie society is a freak with pink-hair and metal all over cuz thats the most common opposite of a normal man/woman in a suit, proper natural hair and a clean face

it's a paradox in that, by acting as such they are defining a "new wave" of beauty where colloquially-defined beauty itself doesnt matter, and then go on to post glamorous pics of themselves thinking they are the new colloquially defined beauty?

which is because they want to belong somewhere, but don't feel like they have enough individuality, so they just join a "brand identity" because then they are part of something

I’m not sure it’s possible to explain using logic.

@Dr.Wol so you are switching from the common notion of "Rebelious Youth" to people that identify as a rebel?

no

i'm saying that in order to have something they can proclaim themselves as, they go with what current society brands rebellious

they don't have a personality thats rebellious

if any of them didnt have some form of cognitive dissonance, there wouldnt be glamor shots of them

it seems to me

you aren't trying to be constructive at all

so ill just leave it at that

i'm not, my original point was to explain as to why those people turn into such weird fashion statements

if you want me to be constructive, i'd say give them a hug and a better purpose in life than to pretend to be something you're not

i mean

it's not about giving them a purpose in life

fair point, "giving them a purpose" is too broad, make it "give them something to strive for"

yeah

so youre saying ping we should nuke Cali

we would be fucked if cali was nuked

a very small one

oh absolutely, the radiation mutation could add years to evolutionary advancement

provided people survive

or maybe detonate underneath them

if you bombed the bay area we would be fucked

tbh, nuking Cali would be stupid

its better to like, nuke some really deserted area near the American border

so the whole world would be like "... is... is this reason enough to retaliate? do we... do we do something? what do we do?"

cuz no one is fool enough to make the first shot that matters

🤔 but fallout

we nuke ourselves

world still goes to war

win-win really

the nukes we've detonated in the US were pretty small

good idea Puke, we nuke ourselves, blame the Chinese and surrender to Sweden

uncontitionally