if they didn't touch that content, they wouldn't justifiably be called publishers because they don't control the content in any way.

something to this effect

so..

the site shoudlnt do any moderation to get the protections associated with not being a publisher

here, its in this video from tim https://youtu.be/grjZiTN1G5Q?t=157

but basically, the previous law that protected craiglist was only created because sites would moderate their users, but still didn't want to be held liable in any way for the content they missed or didn't know would be bad.

i.e. something like code words

but if they didn't moderate, then they wouldn't fall into the publisher category and would be protected from liability in a different way

i'm wondering if you can make a website that might still fall under the other category, and if that would protect against the sex traffickers bill

it seems like there is potential to capitalize on the growing number of people getting banned everywhere for one mistake or one accusation.

without worry of there being a law that someone can try shut you down with

I see several possibilities

the first one is going private

on closed communities it's hard to get reported

even if you do, it's hard for the complain to be public

because they will have no access

Simply provide the service, and give the users said moderation tools.

the other possibility I see is

you show the reporter to a moderator

peer to peer encyprion intercommunication with peer to peer cloud based decentralized storage of all relevant data that the person storing it cant even access cause its encrypted

downside: no one will own the platform, and anything goes

even stuff like child porn would not be able to be deleted

cause you can not detect who is holding it, and you can not detect what you are holding

on the plus side, it would be a completely free zone, where you could do anything you wanted to do on the internet and get away with it anonymously, unles you a dummy and dox urself

you can't

you will have witch hunts

look at what people think of TOR

what people think would not matter in my example

there is nothing to witch hunt

ofc there is 😏

TOR is exactly what you described

unless you want to go after everyone that sends and receive encrypted data

it became a place where you mostly only go for illegal stuff

that's what happened

the FBI tracks everyone on TOR that they can

you cant detect what is being sent or received though

they control most exit nodes

wouldnt you be able to avoid all that using a vpn though? like what i just said but hidden behind a peer to peer encrypted vpn as well

assuming the vpn doesn't sell you over

which in case of the FBI, they have the power to force the VPN company to "sell" you over

they have to comply