Message from @Dunk Massive
Discord ID: 442938986105798658
And that was the 20..14? edition of that video.
And it's less john oliver and more of people like level1techs.
Who are.. surprisingly libertarians.
Hey WHAT
Any chance you'd let us peruse your google doc?
^
sure
ill just post the links i have in it
https://techpolicycorner.org/net-neutrality-v-title-ii-explained-3ad8d576a50a?gi=d700429c7755
http://assets.wharton.upenn.edu/~faulhabe/Econ_Net_Neut_Review.pdf
https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=705009006021024104001073069002067110033043005000058070028025100125004021119011090024019049032015010126055087025125015120024108055071011065053094003124022006113007000012008104069025101119113015111074125020067005025006027025029104027029072027115064099&EXT=pdf
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/168551/1/Yeh-Cheng.pdf
My general point is that the internet thrived without net neutrality rules through the 90s, the naughts, and up until 2014.
This dude actually goes pretty indepth with that.
Including history.
and I have a YT video by 1791L, but I haven't looked through the primary sources yet so I won't post it
And yes, note that in the very first two minutes of the video he explains his inherent distrust of the government.
This is too long to watch rn but I'll try to take a peek at it
I'll listen to it at work. Send me a link in DMs for bookmark's sake
but in general I don't get any info from YT videos because that's not a reliable source
WHAT is generally right, there.
like, ya need to get some research papers and primary sources
not a 45 YO neckbeard
a 45 YO neckbeard with cited sources in the description would probably be better than absolutely nothing tho
right
but he doesn't site any
cite
The other alternative.
Is going through the 45 videos he's done discussing it with onetab sources.
I'll give him a fair listen tomorrow at work.
You would think he would put all sources down
It's a livestream.
It's not a produced video, it's a livestream.
you can edit descriptions
it would just be easier is all im sayin
To be fair, we don't know what angle he's taking on this to begin with.
He might cite articles visually.
etc.
and sources sometimes dont doo much. Like huffpo will have an article about "the health benefits of chocolate" and cite a study but if you read the study it is inconclusive
But women love chocolate, so publish it anyway.
yeah, I'm not trying to discredit him