The 'Animals' comment has cited context

Transcripts, video evidence of it

And evidence of previous times he's said the exact same thing.

i think most of that media already alienated the objective/rational viewers, and are now just pandering to the remaining anti-trump fanatics

cuz it gives them good ratings

Some things, there are two sides

Especially if an objective perspective doesn't exist

and then other times, there's objective evidence.

and other times, theres an agenda

and relevency

and I think, that's the problem

theres always an agenda

relevency

And if the objective evidence disagrees with one person's side of things to a certain degree, it becomes clear that they're lying.

honeslty, not always

but probalby 98% of the time

and it didn't used to be that high

There literally is an agenda 100% of the time.

at least it wasn't apparent

Everyone has an agenda.

If you're running a company, you've got an agenda.

Tim has an agenda.

My company has an agenda

i lost my agenda 😦

well too make money of course

but yo know what I mean

Not always.

yeah

I mean, yes.

sometimes it's as simple as, "This happeened, these people were invovled, and this is what's going to happen next"

You want to make money.

most times it's not

But the question is: how? what are you doing, why are you different

im totally not arguing the premise

I'm just saying

that people are waking up to agendas

I'm building a company to promote matters within the state of Texas

and I have a motivation for it: Cultural independence.

you think that's possible>

not "Remembering the Alamo"?

we have too many damn transplants