Message from @Grenade123
Discord ID: 447048374831808522
I guess its just the classic bourgeoisie vs proles
the bourgeoisie are not really affected by immigrants (unless they are highly skilled immigrants) whereas the proles are
And above the new slave owner class would be the Soros types who see immigration waves as power. Engineering crises through population change in order to expand their power.
nah crisis is bad for soros
a stable market gives him confidence... without it he could lose everything
dude, the genius knows how to exploit chaos
so crisis it is
crisis follow rules
just as everything else
you just need to be far enough away from it to observe, notice and use to your advantage
grab seven friends and play twilight imperium every weekend for the next half year. you'll figure it out
nah crisis is bad news for the rich... volatility it fine... but crisis could lose you billions
a recession in one country these days is pretty much a recession in every country
If I were an amoral billionaire who wanted to expand my power in the US I'd try my damnedest to collapse nations in South America while simultaneously organizing migrant caravans north and pro-immigration protests in the US.
A smart billionaure wants order to mantain it. A genius creates chaos and profits from it.
for what reason?
@wacka you just don't know how to set things up properly before flipping over the dominos
you only make money for a crisis if you have stable place to offer to "help" rebuild after the crisis.
@Grenade123 the simplest one? just the game
like american post WW2
@Grenade123 You assume too much good natured hearts. After a certain amount of money, making more or gaining more influence, is just a game to some people. nothing more
yes
good nature?
how is internationally destabilizing a country so you can "offer to help" rebuild it to make more money and gain influence "good nature"
for some people that is enough. unless you figure out an ulterior motive, even that of a bond villain, it is, in all cases "the game", it is being played anyway, deeper reasons or not, if you want it or not
you were mentioning the sensible rich people
Like Warren Buffett lobbying Obama to block oil pipelines. He owns all the oil tanker rolling stock.
bill gates has supported social justice nonsense. i believe he is good natured. i also belief he is a crook and a twat and an idiot
It's vastly more expensive and more dangerous to move oil by rail, and Warren Buffett doesn't need the money, but he is exercising power by blocking pipelines.
"you only make money for a crisis if you have stable place to offer to "help" rebuild after the crisis." this was your "good" reasoning. it is not necessary to simply play the game for the game's sake
and if you're a psychopath, why would you care for the fates of people? they're just statistics. or you're a sadist, and may enjoy the suffering
that is no a "good" reason. outside good from a PR sense as it is an easy sell to make hand of fist money and gain easy influence
staying on the topic of soros, as he was brought up; does anything know whether he is psychologically deviant?
Or worse, you could believe you are helping them by killing them.
because you could infer some things from that
Stalin honestly believed what he was doing was best.
so did hitler
they thought of it as necessary evils
i feel like we are in "jews are evil because they are jews" argument.
that's just you thinking that