Message from @>Cytos, de lieve goede synth
Discord ID: 447128093845618688
("take back" is probably not the correct term there.. but you know what I was trying to mansplain)
I think men need to claim "Femsplain" instead, where they then belittle the people who care by pretending to lower themselves to their standards :P
"Let me femsplain it so you understand"
If they find it sexist, you then cure the whole point of <gender>splaining
If they are insulted, you can laugh at them, making their point moot
If they accept it, you have an excuse 😛
that just seems like you are belittling people tho... also Im not thinking just when youre talking to women .. Im think just in general... just basically erode the word "explain" from existance
you two are assuming that they posesess something resembling self awareness
doesnt matter if they dont
imagine in 5yrs if the word mansplain was basically synonymous with explain.... if a woman said "stop mansplaining" it would essentially sound (to anyone) like they are basically saying "stop explaining"
(which in a way they already are... unless Ive misunderstood what mansplain means)
you will not get it to be synonymous with explain because the only people using it now are stupid idiots and reasonable people will not use it because they don't want to look like a stupid idiot
and yes, it does mean "stop explaining things i don't want to understand"
Ive just seen it in a few tweets recently
every single time i've seen it in a tweet (which is the only place i've seen it outside of buzzfeed or the like) it was used by someone who i would not want to interact with on any level
hence the belittling,
Rationality doesn't work on people who actually use Mansplaining unironically
might aswell make it a snowflake thing 😛
update on the molenbeek fire from a couple days ago
apparently some actress from westworld was saying people mansplain the series to her
the investigators concluded that the fire might have been arson
also
actors are not people i have respect for
1 person got sent to the hospital in shock
what about Tom Hanks?
14k RTs 55k likes https://twitter.com/TheTweetOfGod/status/997521849775898624?s=20
I mean... theyre still counting the bodies
to be fair,
As much as i genuinely enjoy that tweet :P
I feel Trump is in a can't win situation, if he says nothing they'll accuse him of not caring cuz he doesn't respond enough
so trump is not allowed to say that there was a shooting?
I think it was just a joke... but the amount of rt's likes kinda says something
i dunno, every single tweet trump makes draws that level
not trumps tweet.... "god"'s tweet
and they're both a mixture of people going "haha" and people going "knock it off fag"
yeah
thats what i'm comparing
aside from the most recent one, Trumps last 10 tweets have gotten ~15,000 retweets and ~50,000 likes
right but how many does "tweet of god" usually get?
and probably about 10k responses that throw unrelated insults at him
if anyone has a case of getting harassed online - its trump 😄
granted thats lower, his usual tweets aren't targeted at the most dividing subject in current time 😛
now that im looking at God's tweets, its only about 20-30% higher than usual
but anyway, good joke, albeit an easy target,
i don't even like the joke. it's basically saying "fuck the victims, i'm not blessing anyone"
true,
But i am easily amused by bouts of random verbal aggression 😛
but its how you interprate it,
One side will see it like you said, where he's basically saying "Fuck the victim, im not blessing anyone"
The other side will see it as god saying "Fuck you asshole, i'm not your tool to pretend to care"