Message from @Radcliffe

Discord ID: 447453584058089484


2018-05-19 08:51:39 UTC  

"They're just white people."

2018-05-19 08:51:55 UTC  

"They are colonizers so they deserve it"

2018-05-19 08:52:02 UTC  

Heard that one before.

2018-05-19 08:52:08 UTC  

Sounds about right.

2018-05-19 13:41:02 UTC  

Sjws are following an ideology that tells them both that Jews are bad but are also a protected class because otherwise they would be Nazis.

2018-05-19 14:37:29 UTC  

the conflict of israel is that of 2 or more groups of people whom have the same claim of homeland over roughly the same geographical location while simotainiously having milinia old history of conflict with eachother, incompatible culture and religion, and influinces on both of them by foreign power to both be the ruler and suppress the other. this does not make for a good foundation for peaceful coexistance to be built upon and its kind of surprising to think its managed to maintain itself for this long (though the reason it kinda has is that the establishment government there that replaced the palestinian regime got that postion by claiming it wouldent do what its doing right now). genocide is a consaquince of conquest when you as a conquerering people can not supress the people who's homes your putting your own next to. if you cannot assimilate to the point of creating a new homogenius society then the only answer is survival of the fittest because your own survival is now more important to you than any principle you may have and any moral you may tote.

2018-05-19 14:37:33 UTC  

the reason we critisize genocide so much in hignsight often is that we recognize as many things in hignsight how easly genocide could have been avoided or how unnessicary genocide was. i actually see the genocide of the palestinians being more reasonible than many other genocides i can think of off the top of my head however those at the time doing them would likely see them as completely justified, reasonible, and purely for their own survival

i think we can easly critisize israel for arguing it wouldent need a genocide in order to maintain its regime or their lack of forthought if they thought they would be able to maintain peace or creation homoginy in israel while keeping the muslims there (though thats a bit of a sins of the father arguement at this point). we can point out the irony of jewish people needing to commit genocide "for blood and soil". but ultimately none of that really matters to the people living there, if they cant see peace on either side and will never compramise and their children will never be able to form a homogynus socity then they have to do whats nessicary for their future, and one of them may need to die.

2018-05-19 16:01:56 UTC  

oh nice... jordan peterson and stephen fry on the same stage... this should be good https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxYimeaoea0

2018-05-19 16:05:16 UTC  

first speaker has already taken peterson out of context... he doesnt look happy 😛

2018-05-19 17:10:50 UTC  

im about an hour into it and ive heard almost nothing from the left side of the stage with any substance

2018-05-19 17:11:18 UTC  

stephen fry is killin it

2018-05-19 17:11:35 UTC  

have you got to the angry peterson bit yet? 😛

2018-05-19 17:11:44 UTC  

i think id rather hear fry and peterson debate

2018-05-19 17:11:55 UTC  

at least something might be said

2018-05-19 17:14:38 UTC  

are you talking about peterson pointing out dyson's racism and then him doubling down?

2018-05-19 17:14:54 UTC  

ya

2018-05-19 17:17:52 UTC  

im so confused how you can argue for group justice and mix it with individual liberty

2018-05-19 17:38:08 UTC  

fry nailed it in the end there

2018-05-19 17:40:47 UTC  

dyson had nothing useful to say the entire time

2018-05-19 17:41:08 UTC  

just confirming his own bigotry and hatred of history

2018-05-19 17:41:49 UTC  

and goldberg has little to say of anything

2018-05-19 17:42:05 UTC  

sounding more guilty and confused

2018-05-19 17:42:13 UTC  

also disliking history

2018-05-19 17:42:53 UTC  

I always agree with most of what fry says... and when I disagree with him, he says a few words and suddenly Im in agreement with him 😛

2018-05-19 17:43:26 UTC  

hes a great persuader

2018-05-19 17:45:56 UTC  

the nonstop hackjob against peterson is really off putting

2018-05-19 17:46:10 UTC  

even IF it was all true 100%

2018-05-19 17:46:15 UTC  

it seems so petty

2018-05-19 17:47:07 UTC  

what's true about it?

2018-05-19 17:47:22 UTC  

nothing i heard in the video

2018-05-19 17:47:27 UTC  

?

2018-05-19 17:47:39 UTC  

Havne' watched the video, assuming you're talking about hte NYT article

2018-05-19 17:48:01 UTC  

no there is this debate thing on youtube

2018-05-19 17:48:01 UTC  

and other things

2018-05-19 17:48:08 UTC  

yeah I'm watching it

2018-05-19 17:48:10 UTC  

its like 2 hours long

2018-05-19 17:50:55 UTC  

so basically fry/peterson gained 6% post debate if you take their poll as scientific

2018-05-19 17:51:23 UTC  

also the video on that page is quite a bit better quality