@RyeNorth its entirely possible

Owns is the wrong term.

He doesn't own it, he represents it. The shareholders own it.

Of which, he may be considered to be one,

Tesla or SpaceX cant suffer legal consequences for what Elon Musk says in his private life

well, it can depending on what he does

give me an example

Alright, let's reframe this question, then.

Does Elon Musk require the power of being the CEO of SpaceX to kick someone out of his living room?

Or, would this be a privilege any property owner would have?

I wonder if Trump deleted Obama's tweets from the @POTUS account

and unfollowed HIllary Clinton

😄

I think Twitter actually designated @POTUS as a special account

There's convoluted work related hypotheticals, but, in general, it's the right of being a property holder

the main reason Trump does not use it.

not exactly the prefect example. his house would also need to be spacex property

Why would it also need to be spacex property?

It's his own living room.

He's had the living room before he was CEO of spaceX

Think of university presidents living in a house provided by the university

Think of Trump Tower.

Rule #1 dont live in a place that u dont own

Not everything that The President of the United States owns is government property

@Ivanfr if you have to pay taxes on it constantly, you don't own it

well u own it as much as u can

Not everything that Elon Musk owns is SpaceX property.

The metaphor translates quite effectively.

i mean, you statement is wrong. it certainly would be better to live in land that the government has no right to and therefore can't tax you

I havent seen such land

I mean u can go to the jungle with a gun and claim land

I mean, I own a company, myself. My car is not company property.

well given that i previously said i treat CEOs as representatives of the company at all times so that anything they say or do related to the company, even if its while they are "off duty", is as good as an official statement for the company, this is not exactly perfect.

Or at least such land with postal service

That doesn't answer the question.

technically no

the best kind of no.

but this is not the same as trump banning people

How so?

He's not banning people, by the way.

Not like Twitter is.