He didn't even get to be represented by legal council

you guys wana know how pale i am?
i went to the beach and it was cloudy the entire time, yet i still got sunburned

peak wypepo

I am not legal expert but i think thats because he got that sentence before

And when he broke the ruling and went and mafe stream in front of court

They just said he broke it and sent him to prison

"Last year Robinson was given a suspended sentence for committing contempt during a rape trial in Canterbury, after he attempted to film the defendants. He had been told that he would go to prison if he broke the law again."

Completely irrelevant.

'if he broke the law again' was yet to be established in a court of law.

And he has the right to be represented by legal council within such a court.

Yeah and since he pleaded guilty

That happened no ?

No

His lawyer wasn't even there

I am no legal expert so cant say how that works

In fact, his laywer had been actively -lied- to about proceedings.

It was very fast for sure

Very fast is an understatement.

I can only say that it sure looks like he broke the suspension on that sentence

So its hard for me imagine him getting away on technicalities with it

Being denied a lawyer or having the state interfere in justice proceedings is hardly a technicality

It's very easy for me

This is a full blown case of criminal mistrial.

He was denied the right to legal council, literally a right equally fundamental to a fair trial as the very concept of 'innocent until proven guilty'

This is not a case of 'oh, his name was spelled 'Tomy' on the official documents so it's mistrial, he goes free'

Well but can you throw the case on those grounds is what i am asking. Because he did broke that suspension and filmed himself doing that

Yes.

Well it will be interesting watching that

In any properly functioning legal system, not only would you be able to throw the case, you would be able to get the judge -barred from office-

Well it did look strange

You'd be able to get so much money in reparations their grand children would still be paying you

Fast track trial with media blackout

But the core of the case

Him breaking the suspension is valid

Again, that wasn't properly established.

Unfortunately

It wasnt properly establiahed but even i can see it happened

He filmed himself doing that

Irrelevant what someone can 'see' happening.

You mean everyone

You can have literally millions of eye witnesses, someone is -innocent- until the opposite is proven by due process in a court of law.