Message from @Atkins
Discord ID: 451441644219138061
and the US failing media?
anyway internet infuencers should talk about it since they are the ones under attack the most.... others will survive... that is why there is silence about it
well private buisness can do what they like in US
so if forced somewhere else...
and it benefits main actors in US also
and risk UK actors uploading using VPNs or Spoofing to get around UK law?
this entire act is to hold the hosts of the information, not the uploaders, liable
if they allow anything with a UK copyright to be uploaded, they are fucked
it will be implemented accross internet... no matter what... wait.. wil find some articles about this...
you just said they can do what they like in the US, yet admit they wont
i'm agreeing here
but the US failing media don't have the money to get around this stuff and in youtube/facebook/twitter/google add these filters, they will have major problems.
can't find rly good reference to this discusion but I found this article instead that might help in the future for posting without platforms:
oh and you are right.. fb didn't implement gdpr to all users:
Having said it would follow GDPR “in spirit”, Facebook’s actions tell a different story. On Wednesday Reuters reported that the company would change its terms of service so that its 1.5 billion non-European users would no longer be covered by the privacy law. Until now, all users outside of the US and Canada have been governed by terms of service agreed with the company’s international headquarters in Ireland. Since any user data processed in Ireland will soon fall under GDPR, Facebook is changing the agreement so users in Africa, Asia, Australia and Latin America are governed by more lenient US privacy laws.
Where it needs to comply with GDPR, Facebook seems to have focused its efforts on getting user consent for its data collection practices () rather than reducing the data it collects. It has developed a sequence of consent requests that explicitly outline how each type of data will be used. However, as the company has designed these requests in a way that makes it harder to opt out than opt in.
okay, so then all people in the EU need to do is use Tor
are you 100% sure yt will not implement filters for it all over the platform? It is under copyright disguise
apparently there are conservatives on roseannes side... all Im seeing is condemnation from everyone but ok https://twitter.com/JarrettHill/status/1001530006231597056?s=20
he really gotcha'd that strawman
its about free speech and racism debate... when you cross the line I guess.... I am from EU and am allowed to say my friends that are monkeys.. but I guess If one would be black american it would be insulting... since history... it was insulting to aristocrates when darwin said it first also lol ... point of view ... but context matter ... also... to you americans: How much % black to be considered black?
she was allowed to say it, but even free speech doesn't protect you from repercussions.
She is an idiot and is annoying, but people liked her show apparently. i think this is just a chance for another network to steal it
So CBD is banned, but YouTube only cracks down on creators who post videos that include ads for CBD companies? No concerns about those, some with tons of subscribers, who discuss at length the benefits of CBD?
Mhmm. we'll see if Fox picks it up and if some of the bleeding hearts on that show want to continue with that network.
there is a difference between selling something, and discussing it
Huh, that's not considered promoting it?
probably depends. i mean, youtube is not known to enforce things equally.
but if its not mentioning a specific company and saying go buy it from then, it might go undetected
J-just a prank bro !
EU's up to shady Internet destoring bullshit!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvXOfq3AB8s&feature=youtu.be
These things come in 2s
Pretty sure US will show something similar in the making soon
Similar to Acta and Sopa
"Arkady Babchenko emerged at a police press conference on Wednesday afternoon in front of journalists who had been expecting updates on the investigation into his murder."
oops? lmao.
"So... the update is....we found him alive"
Yeah pretty much
Pretty weird if you consider they are blaming russia
they seem to claim it was to find who was actually trying to kill him... how that logic works? no clue
wait, hold on, this EU thing, doesn't it mean that no one will be able to share news stories?