Hey @Timcast pretty good take on that article 13

Also i expect czechs might throw spanner into it when it gets to the part where national governments put their input

Unless it already got through it

Yes they are different things, but will always have a big overlap. If a jew wasn't depressed in 1945 then they were probably mentally ill, if a white south African isn't paranoid then they probably are mentally ill. Yet depression and paranoia are both mental illnesses in the norm of earth.

I just want a shirt that says "Save our memes"

Just checked

It already got through national parliaments

So it realy is left to eu parliament only now

I really hate when politicians try to regulate internet

In gb they have the porn registry plans

And now this

I'm guessing that EU bureaucrats still don't use this new fangled internets thing.

They seems so clueless.

All politicians are like this tbh

Half of them cant even use internet properly

@Timcast If you want to read on the issue - here is the document. You may want to read Article 11 and Article 12, that are "Link Tax" related. Article 13, and 14 with recitals 38 and 39 are most related to "Content ID filtering" on sites. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52016PC0593

At jbp be jealous

“ Google listed “ Nazism” as the ideology of the California Republican Party” by Alex Thompson on Vice

I don’t think this was an accident.


http://archive.today/3xYGV

lol ya I saw that

wow

Lol, why are all the accidents always in favour of the left?

Apparently it was on the Wikipedia side
http://archive.today/KSrg7

doesn't wikipedia supervise changes?

7 days before someone noticed...

Funny huh. Especially funny since YouTube is fighting fake news and conspiracy theories by putting Wikipedia links in videos.

Wiki is lefty, that sounds like a "good way" for propaganda

Imagine that. Peterson is the same in person as in his videos.

Supposedly some student tested wikipedia's supervision of its content in the 1990s and posted some fake information

Wikipedia took it down, but not before the press got a hold of it

What the EU forget, is Egypt already tried this, and the invention of VPN sprouted, all they are doing is making people become anonymous online, and if you aren't identifiable then you will have no reason to hold back.

This is basically just the EU calling for the next-generation of VPNs that aren't server based, everything will be hidden in video instead of straight encrypted for example, and shared on a torrent type system.

Partly true

It is aimed mainly on service providers

Can’t they just block the VPNs?

are they actually trying to do something here? or is trump just holding an opinion? https://twitter.com/brosandprose/status/1002269050351833088?s=20

(by they I mean the gov)

It’s probably an opinion.

Of course the media would try pushing it as a demand.

I don’t think it’s the first time it’s happened either.

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1002508937445478402?s=21

Clearly not as bad as the media says it is.