Message from @Poppy Rider
Discord ID: 453747254096953349
Lando has privilege points now.
I really dont want to accept that explanation for the writing, yet I cant think of any evidence that contradicts it
Perhaps solo will have some male positive actions in it
Well, you have Finn and Poe left. Finn is mostly characterized by running away and being wrong. Poe is mostly characterized by disobeying and getting people killed.
Poe is pretty much guaranteed to die.
He has no love interest, no real reason to be kept around. His death would be a useful plot device.
So they could have him do something self-sacrificing, or have him die due to betrayal.
But he's a dead man walking.
And Finn's role in the next film is to realize that he's only infatuated with Rey and actually loves Rose. And he'll show this in some climatic scene by repeating the words Rose told him at the end of TLJ.
wait rose is trans in canon?
I think he was joking, but who knows at this point.
The surname of the actress is Tran
i dont actually think she should have been harrassed for this movie, its easy to blame the actors for the way a movie is but its not correct
Of course she shouldn't be harassed.
i believe the director/writer should be HEAVLY critisized till the day he dies, but also not harrassed
The people doing the harassing are extremely immature and are basically throwing a childish tantrum because they can't think of a constructive outlet for their anger.
There's nothing wrong with being angry that something you love is being ruined, but it needs to be channeled in a constructive way. Tons of people have produced videos or written articles explaining all the problems with the movie, and that's completely legit.
But harassing someone who had basically no hand in causing the problem? Completely stupid.
This is the problem with the internet. It is not harassment she was getting. If 10,000 people each decide to send you a message telling you what a prick you are, you are not being harassed. It seems like it from your end but from the people sending the message they have only sent one message. Any ideas on how the square that circle?
Don't use your real life identity online? Dropping pseudonymity from the internet was a mistake.
That's not going to work if you are already in the public eye and even if you are anon have a tirade of ppl sending you messages can make your accounts nearly use able.
Perhaps develop a thicker skin?
Basically.
Not allow the opinions of random people on the internet to influence your state of mind/opinions on things?
If you're putting yourself out in public with millions and millions of people looking at you, then you need to be able to deal with the fact that at least some of those millions are assholes.
If you can't deal with that, don't go online with your real identity.
Given the population of the world and internet connectivity, you probably have to be willing to put up with at least a million people hating your guts
Especially if you're a public figure or celebrity.
The whole point of pseudonymity is protection. Protecting your real life from online assholes.
Now that we've abandoned that paradigm in favor of using your actual identity online, you can either learn to deal with assholes yourself, or get censorious.
there is an actual problem here that isint as simple as "if you cant stand the heat stay out of the kitchen"
though this problem might be older than the internet
I understand all that and I agree. But if you are a public figure and want a presence online but hundreds on thousands of people hate you, none of individually harassing you but each sending a message you would spend over half your time banning people. Thats not having thin skin thats not having the time to enjoy the net.
Do the messages pop up when you open your browser?
Too bad. Have a separate pseudonymous account for actually using the internet. Have another publicity page managed by your agent.
Do they prevent you from using the internet until youve awnsered each one?
As far as im aware you can freely ignore messages and continue to browse the internet.
before the internet i have to imagine that public figures got hate mail, though probably not in the quantity that they probably get online messages. still your ways of dealing with either the old form of hate and the new form of hate have to be exactly the same, as they are the same thing in principle dispite different quantity and media form. however, are people who are assholes completely absolved of their actions dispite only being individuals who have all their attention pointing in the the same direction? people should be strong enough to get over assholes, but at the same time assholes are bad
If you think that a celebrity can actually have an account on Twitter or Instagram or whatever where they just act like a regular normie jackoff and not have an experience different from joe blow, you're nuts.
but they may want to be normal
Like should Trump expect that his Twitter is going to be free of harassment?