Too bad. Have a separate pseudonymous account for actually using the internet. Have another publicity page managed by your agent.

Do they prevent you from using the internet until youve awnsered each one?

As far as im aware you can freely ignore messages and continue to browse the internet.

before the internet i have to imagine that public figures got hate mail, though probably not in the quantity that they probably get online messages. still your ways of dealing with either the old form of hate and the new form of hate have to be exactly the same, as they are the same thing in principle dispite different quantity and media form. however, are people who are assholes completely absolved of their actions dispite only being individuals who have all their attention pointing in the the same direction? people should be strong enough to get over assholes, but at the same time assholes are bad

If you think that a celebrity can actually have an account on Twitter or Instagram or whatever where they just act like a regular normie jackoff and not have an experience different from joe blow, you're nuts.

but they may want to be normal

Like should Trump expect that his Twitter is going to be free of harassment?

theres a difference between a politician who has control over life and death of millions compaired to an actor

I disagree, but what about Kanye then?

you disagree? how can you disagree?

Should he be able to post his thoughts on social media without getting dogpiled?

its a different job

its so different that the comparison is mindboggling

its like apples to dogs

Because if celebrities must be kept safe from negative comments, these social media companies are going to have to invest heavily in censoring technology.

Humans won't be able to handle the job.

A small time actor will not have a money to have someone manage their account and yes it can stop you from using the net. You have to read a mesage to work out if you want to ban that person. Therer come a point where you are spending more time blocking ppl than have a convocation.

now were discussing something different

No, we're not. If you're a celebrity you're an idiot if you're associating your real name and identity to a social media account you actually intend to use for personal use.

And if you don't intend to use it for personal use, then you have to expect to receive criticism.

What about the account you set up to talk to your fans?

You're going to get hate.

You have to learn to deal with it.

theres a difference between criticism and insult

Too bad. The internet isn't a nice place.

The only way to turn the internet into a hugbox is powerful machine-driven censorship.

your responce to the problem is "i like the way things are and anyone who has a problem with the way things are legitiment or not can fuck off" its not a very useful responce

Because this isn't a problem.

it is a problem

You do have the right to insult someone

its older than the internet

If I go down to speaker's corner and say stuff that people don't like, I can expect a crowd to yell shit at me.

You do not have the right to make them listen to your insults

It's not a bug. It's a feature.

The only way to prevent the crowd yelling shit at me is censorship.

The crowd is just bigger online.

the internet for these people is like a place where to expose themselves as who they really are requires them to be exposed to mobs, mob sized quantitys of both praise and hate. its like walking down the street to the groscery store while being followed by thousands of people cheering and booing constantly and your responce is "the only way to solve this (and i would even take the time to consiter any other solution) would ruin everything so this person has to suffer the consaquences of the system"

They can make a pseudonymous account. They do not have to use their real identity.

how fun

What is your proposal?

i havent gotten to one yet, ive been to busy pointing out how giving up on finding a solution isint a solution