which is funny, because china has the population to be the world police

i'm really surprised Russia and China don't push against the US harder

they must not really care about much outside their area

They're both on very thin ice with their own populations

When the chips are down who would most of the world side with? South America with the US, Europe the US.

Cant exert power externally if internal support doesnt exist for it

India with the US.

Russia has massive dissent to the point where they have to arrest opposition leaders to keep putin in power

China has done a good job of shoving dissent down, but when their economic bubble bursts it will rush back to the surface

The fact of the matter is that if the US isnt projecting power around the globe someone else will be

I have yet to find another country that is as bad at imperialism as the US is, so im going with them

No other country is willing to go into that much debt

wooo world hegemony

" is as bad at imperialism as the US is, so im going with them"

this comment entertains me, idk why

unfortunately the united states form of imperialism is no more lasting than any other. its just that the problems were having from it are different

infact its slowly slipping from us right now

you cant control the world unless you control the people, you cant control the people through occupation (old form imperialism) and you cant control the people through instigation (neo-con imperialism) the position that the usa has influincing the rest of the world is directly through the power it physically presents outward toward the rest of the world. ultimately we still rule by fear but its more of a fear of us getting involved in any affaire between foreign powers than it is a fear of direct attack. this keeps the rest of the world more or less docial. but the cracks are begining to show. this is highly taxing on the united states requiring a constantly high trained invasion army at all times and also having a highly global focus that distracts from internal affaire on a top down level. the people at the bottom care about whats going on inside their own country just as much as the people at the top care about everything going on outside their country to far to great extremes. weve created a condition of living on a global scale that mandates constant communication and cooperation between peoples without anscesteral paralells to draw from. all of this is slowing the united states down to a screeching halt while the development of everywhere else, while stunted by the united states looming above it, is steadly growing, though even then their method of growth hasent been healthy, underneith everything i see an eminant economic collapse as business world wide contenues to fail without taxe payer assistance

Nice blog

duh, thats why the US is the worst at imperialism

Instead of occupying every nation in the world weaker than it and forcibly annexing it

they just build a base and establish an alliance with them

https://www.tribtalk.org/2018/06/06/abbotts-school-safety-plan-respects-the-2nd-amendment/

@Grenade123 Do you find that ppl are less likely to break the law coz of fear of losing their right to own a gun?

Gun owners commit less crimes than even police officers so I'd say so.

But not for fear of losing their rights.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-metro-segregated-beach-20180606-story.html

Segregation is progressive

"Unfortunately, our website is currently unavailable in most European countries."

Trust a Jew to cause more problems between Men and Women, wasn't the Jewish created ideology known as feminism enough?

lul not everything was created by jews.. theyre not gods

I know they didn't create everything which is bad but they did create feminism. I linked some proof in <#398973785426100234>.

I got a story for tomorrow but I need a lawyer

trying to find a lawyer with experience in press issues

Does anyone have the vid where tim talks about how wikipedia works and some of its flaws but strengths? Im in another convo somewhere which is semi related to how rating sites and credibility are useful, semi tied to the Pravda site.

maybe theres a contact somewhere for that "youtuber law" guy?

or who's the other one? ... something french?

the lawyer covering sargon's case?

yeah

think hes in tech law tho

well hes covering fair use

that's not tech

necessarily